嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
湘弼慕汐 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

phenomenology of mind-及4嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



          regarded�察�and for certain purposes are in fact regarded�察�as merely distinct and detached
          units living together。 Each functions as an individuality�察�endowed with certain powers and
          capacities for self´expression�察�pursuing his ends for his own interest�察�spontaneously
          putting forth his energies without being clearly aware of or concerned with any universal
          result which his essentially universal nature must bring about。 In realizing his individuality
          he goes out of himself in one sense�察�in another sense he does not。 By expressing himself
          he carries out some ;end; in which he has an ;interest;�察�he;does;something�此�he does a
          deed or a ;work;�察�which qua mere action is nothing more than a mode of purposed
          self´expression�察�and is not�察�as such�察�either good or bad ��at this stage��。 What he does
          appears as external to himself�察�but is his own all the while�察�something which he has
          formed and in which he specifically is interested。 Such a result at once objective�察�framed by
          himself and reflecting his interest�察�is ;fact; as distinct from ;thing; ��which is an object of
          perception at the level of consciousness�察�not of self´consciousness��。 But by the nature of
          the case he can distinguish within this fact what is the real ;intent; ��die Sache Selbst�� he
          has in mind from the merely objective character of the fact ��Sache���察�he can�察�if we may put
          it so�察�distinguish the ;fact of the matter; from mere ;matter of fact;。 But other individuals
          with whom he is associated and who are similarly constituted�察�carry on the same process of
          separate self´expression。 Each is ;honest; and ;honourable; in so doing�此�each is
          concerned with his own ;real intent; and his own ;fact;。 By this association they necessarily
          are interrelated and intercommunicate。 But communication on such a basis leads to
          misconception�察�transference of intent�察�and ;deception; of each other as well as of
          themselves。 Work�察�deeds�察�facts have a universal character as well as a particular nature�此�in
          the former aspect they cannot be one's own�察�in the latter aspect they cannot be another's��
          yet both aspects are inseparable。 Intercommunication between these individuals thus
          inevitably leads to contradiction。 It implies a common universal nature between the
          individuals�此�but such universality at this stage is implicit not explicit。 The contradiction
          inherent at this level between the elements in the situation created by individuals merely
          coexisting together without a conscious common purpose controlling and guiding all�察�points
          the way and compels an advance to another stage in the evolution of rational individuality。

          When self´conscious individuals are regarded as merely ;together;�察�as coexisting without
          consciously controlling common purposes�察�they resemble a community or herd of animals。
          Hence the title of the Section。

          It is not an accidental but an essential aspect of the life of society�察�it is indeed the
          indispensable basis of community which is in one respect like a community of ants�察�the
          system of activity of its component individuals�察�though each may and does fulfil his
          purpose as his own private interest。

          This aspect of social existence can be over´emphasized and may be regarded at times as
          the sole nature of society。 The result can only lead to confusion。 Such a conception of
          society may perhaps be said to be found where�察�as in certain economic conceptions of
          society�察�society is viewed as a herd of self´interested units each pursuing his own individual
          ends。 It is also seen in certain historical forms of national polity which recur from time to
          time。

                    ��1�� The Notion of Individuality as Real
                    ��2�� Actual Fact and Individuality
                    ��3�� Mutual Deception and Spiritual Substance

          b。 Reason as lawgiver

          Translator's comments�此�The next step in the development of individuality is to bring out the
          universal conditions of its co´existence with other individualities。 This it can do because it
          is complete in itself�察�and is essentially self´conscious reason。 These conditions are many��
          because of the diversity of its own content and of the relations in which it stands�察�and are
          yet the conditions of individuality which is one and single。 Hence their plurality never
          implies a separation�察�the conditions limit each other's operation and their precise
          operation must be determined。

          These�察�then�察�are the two stages in determining the general conditions or laws of
          co´existence of individuality�此。�1�� the enunciation of different laws by and for rational
          individuality�察。�2�� the relation of these laws inter se�察�and to the single principle from which
          they all proceed。 Both stages owe their existence to the activity of reason。 Reason
          promulgates laws�察�and criticizes�察�tests the validity of�察�the laws。

          Hence the two following sections。

          c。 Reason as test of laws

��BB��。 Spirit

VI。 Spirit

          Translator's comments�此�In the preceding section there is analysed the attempt on the part
          of individuality to operate as its own legislator and judge of laws holding for individuals。
          Individuality may claim the privilege of enunciating laws universal in character but having
          their source and inspiration solely in the single individual。 Such laws can at best only be
          regulative and cannot be constitutive of the substance of individuality�察�for the substance of
          individuality necessarily involves other individuals within it。 In short individuality is itself
          only realized as a part of a concrete whole of individuals�此�its life is drawn from common life
          in and with others。 To attempt to enunciate laws from itself as if it could create the
          conditions of its own inherent universality can only issue in one result�此�laws are furnished
          without the content which gives those laws any meaning�察�or else the laws and the content
          remain from first to last external to one another。 But if laws are purely formal�察�they cease
          to be i。e。 constitutive conditions of individuality。 Hence the attempt above described is
          sure to break down by its own futility。 What is wanted to give the laws meaning is the
          concrete substance of social life�此�and when this concrete substance is provided ipso facto
          the attempt of individuality to create laws disappears�察�for these laws are already found in
          operation in social life。 Only such laws have reality。 But this involves the further step that
          individuality is only realized�察�only finds its true universal content�察�in and with the order of a
          society。 Here alone is individuality what it is in truth�察�at once a particular focus of
          self´consciousness�察�and a realization of universal mind。 This condition where individuality
          is conscious of itself only in and with others�察�and conscious of the common life as its own��
          is the stage of spiritual existence。 Spiritual existence and social life thus go together。 The
          following section begins the analysis of this phase of experience�察�which extends from the
          simplest form of sociality ! the Family ! up to the highest experience of universal mind !
          Religion。

          The immediately succeeding section may be taken as the keystone of the whole arch of
          experience traversed in the Phenomenology。 Here it is pointed out that all the preceding
          phases of experience have not merely been preparing the way f or what is to follow�察�but
          that the various aspects�察�hitherto treated as separate moments of experience�察�are in
          reality abstractions from the life of concrete spirit now to be discussed and analysed。

          It is noteworthy that from this point onwards the argument is less negative in its result
          either directly or indirectly�察�and is more systematic and constructive。 This is no doubt
          largely because hitherto individual mind as such has been under review�察�and this is an
          abstraction from social mind or spiritual existence。

          A。 Objective Spirit�此�the ethical order

               a。 The ethical world�此�law divine and human�此�man and woman

          Translator's comments�此�The first step in the analysis of spirit is to take spirit as a realized
          actual social order�察�immediately given as a historical fact�察�and present directly to the
          mincls of the individuals composing it。 This is social life as an established routine of
          human adjustments�察�where the natural characteristics and constitution of its moral
          individuals are absorbed and built into the 
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��