嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
湘弼慕汐 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

phenomenology of mind-及3嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



          meaning apart from the reality with which thought is necessarily concerned�察�laws of thought
          are laws of ;thinking;�察�and thinking is both form and content�此。�2�� observation gives each
          law an absolute being of its own�察�as if it were detached from the unity of
          self´consciousness�察�whereas this unity is the fundamental principle of each and all the
          laws�察�which only exist in and by the single process of that unity。 Hence a type of logic
          confined to ;observing; laws of thought is necessarily untrue。 Observation again fails in the
          second case because it is impossible to separate mind from its total environment。
          Observational or empirical psychology therefore is incapable of giving an adequate account
          of mind the constitution of the environment enters into and in part determines the
          constitution of the psychic events�察�and the latter cannot be explained even as events
          without interpreting the former at the same time。

                    ��1�� Laws of Thought
                    ��2�� Psychological Laws
                    ��3�� The Law of Indiviuality

          c。Observation of self´consciousness to its immediate actuality。 Physiognomy
          and Phrenology

          Translator's comments�此�In the previous section observation was directed upon the relation of
          mind to external reality ! the natural environment of individuality。 The relation of mind to
          its own physical embodiment furnishes a further object for observation to take up。 How
          observation operates in dealing with this relation forms the subject of the analysis in the
          present section。 

          Up to and at the time at which Hegel wrote�察�the discussion of this relation took the form of
          what are now looked upon either as spurious sciences or at best as falling within the scope
          of physiology or psychophysics。 Those pseudo´sciences were Physiognomy and Phrenology
          or Cranioscopy。 Both had in one form or another engaged the attention of reflective minds
          from the earliest times。 But about the latter half of the eighteenth century they gained
          unusual public prominence�察�in Germany�察�France and England�察�through the eloquence and
          conviction of their exponents�察�so much so that in Germany a law was passed forbidding the
          promulgation of phrenology as being dangerous to religion�察�and in England a law of
          George II re´enacted a statute of Elizabeth imposing the severest penalties on
          physiognomists。 The chief exponents and propagandists of these studies of the human
          individual were Lavater ��1741´1801���察�in physiognomy�察�and Gall ��1758´1828���察�along with
          his pupil Spurzheim�察�in phrenology。 The personal character and influence of the first��
          combined with his rhetorical eloquence�察�compelled the attention not only of the popular
          mind but of men of outstanding intelligence�察�while Gall lectured publicly and went from one
          University to another expounding the generalizations discovered or made。 

          It was impossible therefore for any philosopher who attempted to discuss comprehensively
          the methods and procedure of observational science to ignore the claims made by these
          pseudo´sciences or to refuse to examine the validity of the laws they proposed to
          formulate。 This was all the more necessary because the object they dealt with ! the
          relation of mind to its physical embodiment ! was and is unquestionably an important fact
          of experience and presents a serious problem to philosophy�察�especially to idealism。 Hence
          we have in the following section an elaborate analysis of the observational ;sciences; of
          physiognomy and phrenology ! an analysis the length of which can only be explained and
          justified by the historical circumstances above indicated。

          B。 Realization of rational self´consciousness through itself

          Translator's comments�此�In this section we have the second form in which rational experience
          is realized。 In ;observation; mind is directly aware of itself as in conscious unity with its
          object�此�it makes no effort of its own to realize this unity�此�it finds the unity by looking on��
          so to say。 But it may have the same experience by creating through its own effort an
          object constituted and determined solely by its self。 Here it does not find the unity of itself
          and its object�察�it makes the object at one with itself by moulding the character and content
          of the object after its own nature。 As contrasted with observation�察�which may be called the
          operation of ;theoretical; reason�察�this new way of having a rational experience may be
          called the operation of ;practical; reason。 In the first we have reason in the form of
          knowledge and science�察�in the second�察�reason in the sense of rational action and practice。

          It is this second way of establishing the experience of reason which is analysed in the
          following sections。 The immediately succeeding section describes the experience in its
          general features。 We have here the sphere of conscious purpose and the foundation of
          moral and social life。

               a。 Pleasure and Necessity

          Translator's comments�此�The succeeding three sections discuss the procedure of one´sided
          subjective individualism ! the attempt to realize the individual and yet not transcend the
          particular individuality。 The first thought of self´consciousness when it seeks to realize or
          objectify itself as a mere individual is to make the objective element return directly to itself
          and bring a sense of increase of its own individual being or private Pleasure。 This is all its
          interest in the practical realization of its purposes。 But the realization of purposes is an
          expression of the life of reason�察�and reason means universality and systematic connexion
          of the content realized。 Hence to seek solely private satisfaction or pleasure by a process
          which is inherently universal is a contradiction in terms。 This contradiction the individual
          discovers in the shape of a sharp and painful contrast between its private feeling of
          individuation on the one hand and a network of universal connexion on the other´the
          contrast between ;pleasure; and ;necessity;。 Both fall within the individual's experience as
          a rational agent�察�and hence this necessity is his own necessity as much as the pleasure is
          his own pleasure。 In the opposition between these factors there is no question as to which
          must triumph�察�and which must surrender。

          This is the type of experience analysed in the following section。 It is an experience that
          constantly recurs in the life´history of most if not all human beings at one stage or another
          in their development。 The analysis contained in this section is indirectly a searching
          criticism of Hedonism in all its forms。

               b。 The law of the heart�察�and the frenzy of self´conceit

          Translator's comments�此�The following section is an analysis of the mood of moral
          Sentimentalism。 It is a mood of all times and appears in many forms�察�but about Hegel's
          time it became prominent in the Romantic school and was frankly adopted as a practical
          attitude by certain of its representatives。 Perhaps one of the most remarkable historic
          examples of sentimentalism was Rousseau�察�to whom so much in the romantic movement
          may be traced。 In the literature of Hegel's time�察�and indeed in all literature�察�no more
          perfect type of sentimentalism can be found than Goethe's Werther。 With such instances as
          these in our minds the succeeding analysis requires neither explanation nor comment。

               c。 Virtue and the course of the world 

          C。 Individuality

               a。 Self´contained individuals associated as a community of animals
               and the deception thence arising�此�the real fact

          Translator's comments�此�The title of this section sounds unfamiliar�察�but the purpose of the
          analysis is plain�察�and the argument is essential as a stage in the unfolding of what rational
          self´contained individuality implies。 It also�察�with the immediately succeeding sections��
          prepares the way for the constructive interpretation of organized society。 Indeed�察�without
          individuals constituted as rational self´conscious units�察�each self´contained�察�a free
          self´conscious community could not exist。 They form the component separate cells of the
          ;organism; of a society�察�the elements out of which the compact structure of a society is
          made。 In the first instance and as an abstract aspect of associated life�察�they can be
          regarded�察�and for certain purposes are in
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��