嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
湘弼慕汐 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

the library(夕慕鋼)-及9嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




     ;Had I but kenn'd�察�Tamlane�察─�she says�察 �Before ye came frae hame�察�I 

wad ta'en out your heart o' flesh�察�Put in a heart o' stane� ─�

       Above   the   lintel   of   his   library   door�察  �Pixerecourt   had   this   couplet 

carved ´ 

       ;Tel est le triste sort de tout livre prete�察�Souvent il est perdu�察�toujours 

il est gate。; 

       M。   Paul   Lacroix   says   he   would   not   have   lent   a   book   to   his   own 

daughter。      Once   Lacroix   asked   for   the   loan   of   a   work   of   little   value。 

Pixerecourt frowned�察�and led his friend beneath the doorway�察�pointing to 

the motto。      ;Yes�察─  �said   M。  Lacroix�察  �but I  thought   that   verse  applied   to 

every one but me。;         So Pixerecourt made him a present of the volume。 

     We     cannot     all  imitate    this   ;immense;       but    unamiable      amateur。 

Therefore�察  �bibliophiles   have   consoled   themselves   with   the   inventions   of 

book´plates�察�quaint representations�察�perhaps heraldic�察�perhaps fanciful�察�of 

their claims to the possession of their own dear volumes。                    Mr。 Leicester 

Warren and M。 Poulet Malassis have written the history of these slender 

works of art�察�and each bibliophile may have his own engraved�察�and may 

formulate his own anathemas on people who borrow and restore not again。 

The   process   is   futile�察  �but   may   comfort   the   heart�察  �like   the   curses   against 

thieves   which   the   Greeks   were   wont   to   scratch   on   leaden   tablets�察  �and 

deposit   in   the   temple   of   Demeter。    Each   amateur   can   exercise   his   own 

taste in the design of a book´plate�察�and for such as love and collect rare 

editions of ;Homer�察─�I venture to suggest this motto�察�which may move the 



                                                26 


´ Page 27´

                                         THE LIBRARY27 



heart of the borrower to send back an Aldine copy of the epic ´ 

       ��Greek text�А。�3�� 

       Mr。 William Blades�察�in his pleasant volume�察 �The Enemies of Books; 

��Trubner���察  �makes   no   account   of   the   book´thief   or   biblioklept。       ;If   they 

injure the owners�察─�says Mr。 Blades�察�with real tolerance�察 �they do no harm 

to   the   books   themselves�察  �by   merely   transferring   them   from   one   set   of 

book´shelves to another。;          This sentence has naturally caused us to reflect 

on   the   ethical   character   of   the   biblioklept。   He   is   not   always   a   bad   man。 

In   old   times�察  �when   language   had   its   delicacies�察  �and   moralists   were   not 

devoid of sensibility�察�the French did not say ;un voleur de livres�察─�but ;un 

chipeur   de   livres�察─  �as   the   papers   call   lady   shoplifters   ;kleptomaniacs。; 

There      are   distinctions。     M。     Jules   Janin    mentions      a  great    Parisian 

bookseller who had an amiable weakness。                 He was a bibliokleptomaniac。 

His   first   motion   when   he   saw   a   book   within   reach   was   to   put   it   in   his 

pocket。     Every one knew his habit�察�and when a volume was lost at a sale 

the auctioneer duly announced it�察�and knocked it down to the enthusiast�察�

who regularly paid the price。           When he went to a private view of books 

about to be sold�察�the officials at the door would ask him�察�as he was going 

out�察�if he did not happen to have an Elzevir Horace or an Aldine Ovid in 

his pocket。      Then he would search those receptacles and exclaim�察 �Yes�察�

yes�察  �here    it  is�察 �so  much   obliged    to  you�察  �I  am   so   absent。;    M。    Janin 

mentions   an   English   noble�察 �a   ;Sir  Fitzgerald�察─  �who had   the same   tastes�察�

but who unluckily fell into the hands of the police。                 Yet M。 Janin has a 

tenderness for the book´stealer�察�who�察�after all�察�is a lover of books。                    The 

moral position of the malefactor is so delicate and difficult that we shall 

attempt   to   treat   of   it   in   the   severe�察 �though   rococo�察  �manner   of Aristotle's 

;Ethics。;      Here     follows    an   extract   from    the  lost  Aristotelian     treatise 

;Concerning Books;�此� 

     ;Among       the   contemplative       virtues   we   reckon     the  love   of   books。 

Now this virtue�察�like courage or liberality�察�has its mean�察�its excess�察�and its 

defect。     The defect is indifference�察�and the man who is defective as to the 

love of books has no name in common parlance。 Therefore�察�we may call 

him the Robustious Philistine。           This man will cut the leaves of his own or 

his friend's volumes with the butter´ knife at breakfast。              Also he is just the 



                                                27 


´ Page 28´

                                          THE LIBRARY28 



person wilfully to mistake the double sense of the term 'fly´leaves��' and to 

stick   the   'fly´   leaves'   of   his   volumes   full   of   fly´hooks。   He   also   loves 

dogs'´ears�察�and marks his place with his pipe when he shuts a book in a 

hurry�察�or he will set the leg of his chair on a page to keep it open。                       He 

praises those who tear off margins for pipe´lights�察�and he makes cigarettes 

with the tissue´paper that covers engravings。                When his books are bound�察�

he   sees   that   the   margin   is   cut   to   the   quick。 He   tells   you   too�察  �that   'HE 

buys books to read them。' But he does not say why he thinks it needful to 

spoil them。      Also he will drag off bindingsor should we perhaps call this 

crime     ��Greek     text�В察  �or   brutality�察  �rather   than    mere    vice�拭   �for   vice   is 

essentially   human�察  �but   to   tear   off   bindings   is   bestial。     Thus   they   still 

speak of a certain monster who lived during the French Revolution�察�and 

who�察�having purchased volumes attired in morocco�察�and stamped with the 

devices   of   the   oligarchs�察  �would   rip   off   the   leather   or   vellum�察  �and   throw 

them  into   the   fire or   out of   the   window�察 �saying   that   'now   he   could   read 

with    unwashed       hands    at  his   ease。'   Such     a  person�察   �then�察  �is  the   man 

indifferent to books�察�and he sins by way of defect�察�being deficient in the 

contemplative virtue of book´loving。               As to the man who is exactly in the 

right   mean�察  �we   call   him   the   book´lover。      His   happiness   consists   not   in 

reading�察 �which   is   an   active virtue�察 �but   in   the  contemplation of   bindings�察�

and illustrations�察�and title´pages。 Thus his felicity partakes of the nature of 

the bliss we attribute to the gods�察 �for that also is contemplative�察�and   we 

call   the   book´   lover   'happy��'   and   even   'blessed��'   but   within   the   limits   of 

mortal happiness。         But�察�just as in the matter of absence of fear there is a 

mean which we call courage�察�and a defect which we call cowardice�察�and 

an excess which is known as foolhardiness�察�so it is in the case of the love 

of books。       As to the mean�察�we have seen that it is the virtue of the true 

book´lover�察�while the defect constitutes the sin of the Robustious Philistine。 

But the extreme is found in covetousness�察�and the covetous man who is in 

the extreme state of book´loving�察�is the biblioklept�察�or book´stealer。                    Now 

his vice shows itself�察�not in contemplation ��for of contemplation there can 

be   no   excess���察  �but   in   action。    For   books   are   procured�察  �as   we   say�察  �by 

purchase�察�or by barter�察�and these are voluntary exchanges�察�both the seller 

and   the   buyer   being   willing   to   deal。   But   books   are�察  �again�察 �procured   in 



                                                 28 


´ Page 29´

                                         THE LIBRARY29 



another way�察�by involuntary contractthat is�察�when the owner of the book 

is unwilling to part with it�察�but he whose own the book is not is determined 

to   take   it。  The   book´stealer   is   such   a   man   as   this�察  �and   he   possesses 

himself of books with which the owner does not intend to part�察�by virtue 

of a series of involuntary contracts。            Again�察�the question may be raised�察�

whether is the Robustious Philistine who despises books�察�or the biblioklept 

who     adores    them    out  of   measure     and   excessively�察   �the   worse    citizen�拭�

Now�察    �if  we   are   to  look   to  the   consequences       of  actions   only    ��as  the 

followers   of   Bentham   advise���察  �clearly   the   Robustious   Philistine   is         the 

worse citizen�察�for he mangles�察�and dirties�察�and destroys books which it is 

the   interest   of   the   State   to   preserve。 But   the   biblioklept   treasures   and 

adorns the books he has acquired�察�and when he dies�察�or goes to prison�察�the 

State receives the benefit at his sale。          Thus Libri�察�who was the greatest of 

biblioklepts�察�rescue
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��