按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
athletic side of Pinky Dinkyism; and their hostility to ideas and to 
the expression of ideas ceased to limit and trouble me。  The 
brighter men of each generation stay up; these others go down to 
propagate their tradition; as the fathers of families; as mediocre 
professional men; as assistant masters in schools。  Cambridge which 
perfects them is by the nature of things least oppressed by them;
except when it comes to a vote in Convocation。
We were still in those days under the shadow of the great 
Victorians。  I never saw Gladstone (as I never set eyes on the old 
Queen); but he had resigned office only a year before I went up to 
Trinity; and the Combination Rooms were full of personal gossip 
about him and Disraeli and the other big figures of the gladiatorial 
stage of Parlimentary history; talk that leaked copiously into such 
sets as mine。  The ceiling of our guest chamber at Trinity was 
glorious with the arms of Sir William Harcourt; whose Death Duties 
had seemed at first like a socialist dawn。  Mr。 Evesham we asked to 
come to the Union every year; Masters; Chamberlain and the old Duke 
of Devonshire; they did not come indeed; but their polite refusals 
brought us all; as it were; within personal touch of them。  One 
heard of cabinet councils and meetings at country houses。  Some of 
us; pursuing such interests; went so far as to read political 
memoirs and the novels of Disraeli and Mrs。 Humphry Ward。  From 
gossip; example and the illustrated newspapers one learnt something 
of the way in which parties were split; coalitions formed; how 
permanent officials worked and controlled their ministers; how 
measures were brought forward and projects modified。
And while I was getting the great leading figures on the political 
stage; who had been presented to me in my schooldays not so much as 
men as the pantomimic monsters of political caricature; while I was 
getting them reduced in my imagination to the stature of humanity; 
and their motives to the quality of impulses like my own; I was also 
acquiring in my Tripos work a constantly developing and enriching 
conception of the world of men as a complex of economic; 
intellectual and moral processes。 。 。 。
5
Socialism is an intellectual Proteus; but to the men of my 
generation it came as the revolt of the workers。  Rodbertus we never 
heard of and the Fabian Society we did not understand; Marx and 
Morris; the Chicago Anarchists; JUSTICE and Social Democratic 
Federation (as it was then) presented socialism to our minds。  
Hatherleigh was the leading exponent of the new doctrines in 
Trinity; and the figure upon his wall of a huge…muscled; black…
haired toiler swaggering sledgehammer in hand across a revolutionary 
barricade; seemed the quintessence of what he had to expound。  
Landlord and capitalist had robbed and enslaved the workers; and 
were driving them quite automatically to inevitable insurrection。  
They would arise and the capitalist system would flee and vanish 
like the mists before the morning; like the dews before the sunrise; 
giving place in the most simple and obvious manner to an era of 
Right and Justice and Virtue and Well Being; and in short a 
Perfectly Splendid Time。
I had already discussed this sort of socialism under the guidance of 
Britten; before I went up to Cambridge。  It was all mixed up with 
ideas about freedom and natural virtue and a great scorn for kings; 
titles; wealth and officials; and it was symbolised by the red ties 
we wore。  Our simple verdict on existing arrangements was that they 
were 〃all wrong。〃  The rich were robbers and knew it; kings and 
princes were usurpers and knew it; religious teachers were impostors 
in league with power; the economic system was an elaborate plot on 
the part of the few to expropriate the many。  We went about feeling 
scornful of all the current forms of life; forms that esteemed 
themselves solid; that were; we knew; no more than shapes painted on 
a curtain that was presently to be torn aside。 。 。 。
It was Hatherleigh's poster and his capacity for overstating things; 
I think; that first qualified my simple revolutionary enthusiasm。  
Perhaps also I had met with Fabian publications; but if I did I 
forget the circumstances。  And no doubt my innate constructiveness 
with its practical corollary of an analytical treatment of the 
material supplied; was bound to push me on beyond this melodramatic 
interpretation of human affairs。
I compared that Working Man of the poster with any sort of working 
man I knew。  I perceived that the latter was not going to change; 
and indeed could not under any stimulus whatever be expected to 
change; into the former。  It crept into my mind as slowly and surely 
as the dawn creeps into a room that the former was not; as I had at 
first rather glibly assumed; an 〃ideal;〃 but a complete 
misrepresentation of the quality and possibilities of things。
I do not know now whether it was during my school…days or at 
Cambridge that I first began not merely to see the world as a great 
contrast of rich and poor; but to feel the massive effect of that 
multitudinous majority of people who toil continually; who are for 
ever anxious about ways and means; who are restricted; ill clothed; 
ill fed and ill housed; who have limited outlooks and continually 
suffer misadventures; hardships and distresses through the want of 
money。  My lot had fallen upon the fringe of the possessing 
minority; if I did not know the want of necessities I knew 
shabbiness; and the world that let me go on to a university 
education intimated very plainly that there was not a thing beyond 
the primary needs that my stimulated imagination might demand that 
it would not be an effort for me to secure。  A certain aggressive 
radicalism against the ruling and propertied classes followed almost 
naturally from my circumstances。  It did not at first connect itself 
at all with the perception of a planless disorder in human affairs 
that had been forced upon me by the atmosphere of my upbringing; nor 
did it link me in sympathy with any of the profounder realities of 
poverty。  It was a personal independent thing。  The dingier people 
one saw in the back streets and lower quarters of Bromstead and 
Penge; the drift of dirty children; ragged old women; street 
loafers; grimy workers that made the social background of London; 
the stories one heard of privation and sweating; only joined up very 
slowly with the general propositions I was making about life。  We 
could become splendidly eloquent about the social revolution and the 
triumph of the Proletariat after the Class war; and it was only by a 
sort of inspiration that it came to me that my bedder; a garrulous 
old thing with a dusty black bonnet over one eye and an 
ostentatiously clean apron outside the dark mysteries that clothed 
her; or the cheeky little ruffians who yelled papers about the 
streets; were really material to such questions。
Directly any of us young socialists of Trinity found ourselves in 
immediate contact with servants or cadgers or gyps or bedders or 
plumbers or navvies or cabmen or railway porters we became 
unconsciously and unthinkingly aristocrats。  Our voices altered; our 
gestures altered。  We behaved just as all the other men; rich or 
poor; swatters or sportsmen or Pinky Dinkys; behaved; and exactly as 
we were expected to behave。  On the whole it is a population of poor 
quality round about Cambridge; rather stunted and spiritless and 
very difficult to idealise。  That theoretical Working Man of ours!
if we felt the clash at all we explained it; I suppose; by assuming 
that he came from another part of the country; Esmeer; I remember; 
who lived somewhere in the Fens; was very eloquent about the Cornish 
fishermen; and Hatherleigh; who was a Hampshire man; assured us we 
ought to know the Scottish miner。  My private fancy was for the 
Lancashire operative because of his co…operative societies; and 
because what Lancashire thinks to…day England thinks to…morrow。 。 。 。  
And also I had never been in Lancashire。
By little increments of realisation it was that the profounder 
verities of the problem of socialism came to me。  It helped me very 
much that I had to go down to the Potteries several times to discuss 
my future with my uncle and guardian; I walked about and saw Bursley 
Wakes and much of the human aspects of organised industrialism at 
close quarters for the first time。  The picture of a splendid 
Working Man cheated out of his innate glorious possibilities; and 
presently to arise and dash this scoundrelly and scandalous system 
of private ownership to fragments; began to give place to a 
limitless spectacle of inefficiency; to a conception of millions of 
people not organised as they should be; not educated as they should 
be; not simply prevented from but incapable o