嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
湘弼慕汐 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

the american republic-及48嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



 United States in convention。  The United States are the one  indivisible sovereign�察�and this sovereign governs alike general  matters in the General government�察�and particular matters in the  several State governments。  All legal authority in either  emanates from this one indivisible and plenary sovereign�察�and  hence the law enacted by a State are really enacted by the United  States�察�and derive from them their force and vitality as laws。   Hence�察�as the United States survive the particular State�察�the  lapse of the State does not abrogate the State laws�察�or dissolve  civil society within its jurisdiction。

324 This is evidently so�察�because civil society in the particular  State does not rest on the State alone�察�nor on Congress�察�but on  the United States。  Hence all civil rights of every sort created  by the individual State are really held from the United States�察 �and therefore it was that the people of non´slaveholding States  were�察�as citizens of the United States�察�responsible for the  existence of slavery in the States that seceded。  There is a  solidarity of States in the Union as there is of individuals in  each of the States。  The political error of the Abolitionists was  not in calling upon the people of the United States to abolish  slavery�察�but in calling upon them to abolish it through the  General government�察�which had no jurisdiction in the case�察�or in  their sole capacity as men�察�on purely humanitarian grounds�察�which  were the abrogation of all government and civil society itself�察 �instead of calling upon them to do it as the United States in  convention assembled�察�or by an amendment to the constitution of  the United States in the way ordained by that constitution  itself。  This understood�察�the constitution and laws of a defunct  State remain in force by virtue of the will of the United States�察 �till the State is raised from the dead�察�restored to life and  activity�察�and repeals or al´ 325                            ters them�察�or till they are repealed  or altered by the United States or the national convention。  But  as the defunct State could not�察�and the convention had not  repealed or altered them�察�save in the one case mentioned�察�the  General government had no alternative but to treat them and all  rights created by them as the territorial law�察�and to respect  them as such。

What then do the people of the several States that seceded lose  by secession�拭 �They lose�察�besides incurring�察�so far as disloyal�察 �the pains and penalties of treason�察�their political rights�察�or  right�察�as has just been said�察�to be in their own department  self´governing communities�察�with the right of representation in  Congress and the electoral colleges�察�and to sit in the national  convention�察�or of being counted in the ratification of amendments  to the constitutionprecisely what it was shown a Territorial  people gain by being admitted as a State into the Union。  This is  the difference between the constitutional doctrine and that  adopted by Mr。 Lincoln's and Mr。 Johnson's Administrations。  But  what authority�察�on this constitutional doctrine�察�does the General  government gain over the people of States that secede�察�that it  has not over others�  �As to their internal 326                                            constitution�察�their  private rights of person or property�察�it gains none。  It has over  them�察�till they are reconstructed and restored to the Union�察�the  right to institute for them provisional governments�察�civil or  military�察�precisely as it has for the people of a territory that  is not and has never been one of the United States�察�but in their  reconstruction it has less�察�for the geographical boundaries and  electoral people of each are already defined by a law which does  not depend on its will�察�and which it can neither abrogate nor  modify。  Here is the difference between the constitutional  doctrine and that of the so´called radicals。  The State has gone�察 �but its laws remain�察�so far as the United States in convention  does not abrogate them�察�not because the authority of the State  survives�察�but because the United States so will�察�or are presumed  to will。  The United States have by a constitutional amendment  abrogated the laws of the several States authorizing slavery�察�and  prohibited slavery forever within the jurisdiction of the Union�察 �and no State can now be reconstructed and be admitted into the  Union with a constitution that permits slavery�察�for that would be  repugnant to the constitution of the United States。  If the  constitutional amendment is not recognized as rati´ 327                                                   fied by the  requisite number of States�察�it is the fault of the government in  persisting in counting as States what are no States。  Negro  suffrage�察�as white suffrage�察�is at present a question for  States。

The United States guarantee to such State a republican form of  government。  And this guarantee�察�no doubt�察�authorizes Congress to  intervene in the internal constitution of a State so far as to  force it to adopt a republican form of government�察�but not so far  as to organize a government for a State�察�or to compel a  territorial people to accept or adopt a State constitution for  themselves。  If a State attempts to organize a form of government  not republican�察�it can prevent it�察�and if a Territory adopts an  unrepublican form�察�it can force it to change its constitution to  one that is republican�察�or compel it to remain a Territory under  a provisional government。  But this gives the General government  no authority in the organization or re´organization of States  beyond seeing that the form of government adopted by the  territorial people is republican。  To press it further�察�to make  the constitutional clause a pretext for assuming the entire  control of the organization or re´organization of a State�察�is a  manifest abusea palpable violation of the constitution and 328                                                              of  the whole American system。  The authority given by the clause is  specific�察�and is no authority for intervention in the general  reconstruction of the lapsed State。  It gives authority in no  question raised by secession or its consequences�察�and can give  none�察�except�察�from within or from without�察�there is an overt  attempt to organize a State in the Union with an unrepublican  form of government。

The General government gives permission to the territorial people  of the defunct State to re´organize�察�or it contents itself with  suffering them�察�without special recognition�察�to reorganize in  their own way�察�and apply to Congress for admission�察�leaving it to  Congress to admit them as a State�察�or not�察�according to its own  discretion�察�in like manner as it admits a new State�察�but the  re´organization itself must be the work of the territorial people  themselves�察�under their old electoral law。  The power that  reconstructs is in the people themselves�察�the power that admits  them�察�or receives them into the Union�察�is Congress。  The  Executive�察�therefore�察�has no authority in the matter�察�beyond that  of seeing that the laws are duly complied with�察�and whatever  power he assumes�察�whether by proclamation or by instructions  given to the provisional governors�察�civil or military�察�is  329                                                           simply  a usurpation of the power of Congress�察�which it rests with  Congress to condone or not�察�as it may see fit。  Executive  proclamations�察�excluding a larger or a smaller portion of the  electoral or territorial people from the exercise of the elective  franchise in reorganizing the State�察�and executive efforts to  throw the State into the hands of one political party or another�察 �are an unwarrantable assumption of power�察�for the President�察�in  relation to reconstruction�察�acts only under the peace powers of  the constitution�察�and simply as the first executive officer of  the Union。  His business is to execute the laws�察�not to make  them。  His legislative authority is confined to his qualified  veto on the acts of Congress�察�and to the recommendation to  Congress of such measures as he believes are needed by the  country。

In reconstructing a disorganized State�察�neither Congress nor the  Executive has any power that either has not in time of peace。   The Executive�察�as commander´in´chief of the army�察�may ex  necessitate�察�pace it ad interim under a military governor�察�but he  cannot appoint even a provisional civil governor till Congress  has created the office and given him authority to fill it�察�far  less can be legally give instructions to the civil governor as to  the mode or manner of recon´ 330                            structing the disorganized State�察�or  decide who may or may not vote in the preliminary reorganization。   The Executive could do nothing of the sort�察�even in regard to a  Territory never erected into a State。  It belongs to Congress�察 �not to the Executive�察�to erect Territorial or provisional  governments�察�like those of Dacotah�察�Colorado�察�Montana�察�Nebraska�察 �and New Mexico�察�and�察�Congress�察�not the executive�察�determines the  boundaries of the Territory�察�passes the enabling act�察�and defines  the electoral people�察�till the State is organized and able to act  herself。  Even Congress�察�in reconstructing and restoring to li
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��