梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
。 47。 And thus came in the use of money�察�some lasting thing that men might keep without spoiling�察�and that by mutual consent men would take in exchange for the truly useful�察�but perishable supports of life。 Sec。 48。 And as different degrees of industry were apt to give men possessions in different proportions�察�so this invention of money gave them the opportunity to continue and enlarge them�此 �for supposing an island�察�separate from all possible commerce with the rest of the world�察�wherein there were but an hundred families�察�but there were sheep�察�horses and cows�察�with other useful animals�察�wholsome fruits�察�and land enough for corn for a hundred thousand times as many�察�but nothing in the island�察�either because of its commonness�察�or perishableness�察�fit to supply the place of money�察�what reason could any one have there to enlarge his possessions beyond the use of his family�察�and a plentiful supply to its consumption�察�either in what their own industry
produced�察�or they could barter for like perishable�察�useful commodities�察�with others�拭 �Where there is not some thing�察�both lasting and scarce�察�and so valuable to be hoarded up�察�there men will not be apt to enlarge their possessions of land�察�were it never so rich�察�never so free for them to take�此�for I ask�察�what would a man value ten thousand�察�or an hundred thousand acres of excellent land�察�ready cultivated�察�and well stocked too with cattle�察�in the middle of the inland parts of America�察�where he had no hopes of commerce with other parts of the world�察�to draw money to him by the sale of the product�拭 �It would not be worth the enclosing�察�and we should see him give up again to the wild common of nature�察�whatever was more than would supply the conveniencies of life to be had there for him and his family。 Sec。 49。 Thus in the beginning all the world was America�察 �and more so than that is now�察�for no such thing as money was any where known。 Find out something that hath the use and value of money amongst his neighbours�察�you shall see the same man will begin presently to enlarge his possessions。 Sec。 50。 But since gold and silver�察�being little useful to the life of man in proportion to food�察�raiment�察�and carriage�察�has its value only from the consent of men�察�whereof labour yet makes�察�in great part�察�the measure�察�it is plain�察�that men have agreed to a disproportionate and unequal possession of the earth�察�they having�察�by a tacit and voluntary consent�察�found out�察 �a way how a man may fairly possess more land than he himself can use the product of�察�by receiving in exchange for the overplus gold and silver�察�which may be hoarded up without injury to any one�察�these metals not spoiling or decaying in the hands of the possessor。 This partage of things in an inequality of private possessions�察�men have made practicable out of the bounds of society�察�and without compact�察�only by putting a value on gold and silver�察�and tacitly agreeing in the use of money�此�for in governments�察�the laws regulate the right of property�察�and the possession of land is determined by positive constitutions。 Sec。 51。 And thus�察�I think�察�it is very easy to conceive�察 �without any difficulty�察�how labour could at first begin a title of property in the common things of nature�察�and how the spending it upon our uses bounded it。 So that there could then be no reason of quarrelling about title�察�nor any doubt about the largeness of possession it gave。 Right and conveniency went together�察�for as a man had a right to all he could employ his labour upon�察�so he had no temptation to labour for more than he could make use of。 This left no room for controversy about the title�察�nor for encroachment on the right of others�察�what portion a man carved to himself�察�was easily seen�察�and it was useless�察�as well as dishonest�察�to carve himself too much�察�or take more than he needed。
CHAP。 VI。
Of Paternal Power。
Sec。 52。 IT may perhaps be censured as an impertinent criticism�察�in a discourse of this nature�察�to find fault with words and names�察�that have obtained in the world�此�and yet possibly it may not be amiss to offer new ones�察�when the old are apt to lead men into mistakes�察�as this of paternal power probably has done�察�which seems so to place the power of parents over their children wholly in the father�察�as if the mother had no share in it�察�whereas�察�if we consult reason or revelation�察 �we shall find�察�she hath an equal title。 This may give one reason to ask�察�whether this might not be more properly called parental power�拭 �for whatever obligation nature and the right of generation lays on children�察�it must certainly bind them equal to
both the concurrent causes of it。 And accordingly we see the positive law of God every where joins them together�察�without distinction�察�when it commands the obedience of children�察�Honour thy father and thy mother�察�Exod。 xx。 12。 Whosoever curseth his father or his mother�察�Lev。 xx。 9。 Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father�察�Lev。 xix。 3。 Children�察�obey your parents�察�&c。 Eph。 vi。 1。 is the stile of the Old and New Testament。 Sec。 53。 Had but this one thing been well considered�察 �without looking any deeper into the matter�察�it might perhaps have kept men from running into those gross mistakes�察�they have made�察 �about this power of parents�察�which�察�however it might�察�without any great harshness�察�bear the name of absolute dominion�察�and regal authority�察�when under the title of paternal power it seemed appropriated to the father�察�would yet have founded but oddly�察�and in the very name shewn the absurdity�察�if this supposed absolute power over children had been called parental�察�and thereby have discovered�察�that it belonged to the mother too�此�for it will but very ill serve the turn of those men�察�who contend so much for the absolute power and authority of the fatherhood�察�as they call it�察�that the mother should have any share in it�察�and it would have but ill supported the monarchy they contend for�察�when by the very name it appeared�察�that that fundamental authority�察�from whence they would derive their government of a single person only�察�was not placed in one�察�but two persons jointly。 But to let this of names pass。 Sec。 54。 Though I have said above�察�Chap。 II。 That all men by nature are equal�察�I cannot be supposed to understand all sorts of equality�此�age or virtue may give men a just precedency�此�excellency of parts and merit may place others above the common level�此�birth may subject some�察�and alliance or benefits others�察�to pay an observance to those to whom nature�察�gratitude�察�or other respects�察�may have made it due�此�and yet all this consists with the equality�察�which all men are in�察 �in respect of jurisdiction or dominion one over another�察�which was the equality I there spoke of�察�as proper to the business in hand�察�being that equal right�察�that every man hath�察�to his natural freedom�察�without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man。 Sec。 55。 Children�察�I confess�察�are not born in this full state of equality�察�though they are born to it。 Their parents have a sort of rule and jurisdiction over them�察�when they come into the world�察�and for some time after�察�but it is but a temporary one。 The bonds of this subjection are like the swaddling clothes they art wrapt up in�察�and supported by�察�in the weakness of their infancy�此�age and reason as they grow up�察�loosen them�察�till at length they drop quite off�察�and leave a man at his own free disposal。 Sec。 56。 Adam was created a perfect man�察�his body and mind in full possession of their strength and reason�察�and so was capable�察�from the first instant of his being to provide for his own support and preservation�察�and govern his actions according to the dictates of the law of reason which God had implanted in him。 From him the world is peopled with his descendants�察�who are all born infants�察�weak and helpless�察�without knowledge or understanding�此�but to supply the defects of this imperfect state�察 �till the improvement of growth and age hath removed them�察�Adam and Eve�察�and after them all parents were�察�by the law of nature�察�under an obligation to preserve�察�nourish�察�and educate the children they had begotten�察�not as their own workmanship�察 �but the workmanship of their own maker�察�the Almighty�察�to whom they were to be accountable for them。 Sec。 57。 The law�察�that was to govern Adam�察�was the same that was to govern all his posterity�察�the law of reason。 But his offspring having another way of entrance into the world�察 �different from him�察�by a natural birth�察�that produced them
ignorant and without the use of reason�察�they were not presently under that law�察�for no body can be under a law�察�which is not promulgated to him�察�and this law being promulgated or made known by reason only�察�he that is not come to the use of his reason�察 �cannot be said to be under this law�察�and Adam's children�察 �being not presently as soon as born under this law of reason�察 �were not presently free�此�for law�察�in its true notion�察�is not so much the limitation as the direction of a free and intelligent agent to his proper interest�察�and prescribes no farther than is for the general good of those under