按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
； who enters into conditions with his captive。 （*Another copy corrected by Mr。 Locke； has it thus； Noxious brute that is destructive to their being。）
Sec。 173。 Nature gives the first of these； viz。 paternal power to parents for the benefit of their children during their minority； to supply their want of ability； and understanding how to manage their property。 （By property I must be understood here； as in other places； to mean that property which men have in their persons as well as goods。） Voluntary agreement gives the second； viz。 political power to governors for the benefit of their subjects； to secure them in the possession and use of their properties。 And forfeiture gives the third despotical power to lords for their own benefit； over those who are stripped of all property。 Sec。 174。 He； that shall consider the distinct rise and extent； and the different ends of these several powers； will plainly see； that paternal power comes as far short of that of the magistrate； as despotical exceeds it； and that absolute dominion； however placed； is so far from being one kind of civil society； that it is as inconsistent with it； as slavery is with property。 Paternal power is only where minority makes the child incapable to manage his property； political； where men have property in their own disposal； and despotical； over such as have no property at all。
CHAP。 XVI。
Of CONQUEST。
Sec。 175。 THOUGH governments can originally have no other rise than that before mentioned； nor polities be founded on any thing but the consent of the people； yet such have been the disorders ambition has filled the world with； that in the noise of war； which makes so great a part of the history of mankind； this consent is little taken notice of： and therefore many have mistaken the force of arms for the consent of the people； and reckon conquest as one of the originals of government。 But conquest is as far from setting up any government； as demolishing an house is from building a new one in the place。 Indeed； it often makes way for a new frame of a common…wealth； by destroying the former； but； without the consent of the people； can never erect a new one。 Sec。 176。 That the aggressor； who puts himself into the state of war with another； and unjustly invades another man's right； can； by such an unjust war； never come to have a right over the conquered； will be easily agreed by all men； who will not think； that robbers and pyrates have a right of empire over whomsoever they have force enough to master； or that men are bound by promises； which unlawful force extorts from them。 Should a robber break into my house； and with a dagger at my throat make me seal deeds to convey my estate to him； would this give him any title？ Just such a title； by his sword； has an unjust conqueror； who forces me into submission。 The injury and the crime is equal； whether committed by the wearer of a crown； or some petty villain。 The title of the offender； and the number of his followers； make no difference in the offence； unless it be to aggravate it。 The only difference is； great robbers punish little ones； to keep them in their obedience； but the great ones are rewarded with laurels and triumphs； because they are too big for the weak hands of justice in this world； and have the power in their own possession； which should punish offenders。 What is my remedy against a robber； that so broke into my house？ Appeal to the law for justice。 But perhaps justice is denied； or I am crippled and cannot stir； robbed and have not the means to do it。 If God has taken away all means of seeking remedy； there is nothing left but patience。 But my son； when able； may seek the relief of the law； which I am denied： he or his son may renew his
appeal； till he recover his right。 But the conquered； or their children； have no court； no arbitrator on earth to appeal to。 Then they may appeal； as lephtha did； to heaven； and repeat their appeal till they have recovered the native right of their ancestors； which was； to have such a legislative over them； as the majority should approve； and freely acquiesce in。 If it be objected； This would cause endless trouble； I answer； no more than justice does； where she lies open to all that appeal to her。 He that troubles his neighbour without a cause； is punished for it by the justice of the court he appeals to： and he that appeals to heaven must be sure he has right on his side； and a right too that is worth the trouble and cost of the appeal； as he will answer at a tribunal that cannot be deceived； and will be sure to retribute to every one according to the mischiefs he hath created to his fellow subjects； that is； any part of mankind： from whence it is plain； that he that conquers in an unjust war can thereby have no title to the subjection and obedience of the conquered。 Sec。 177。 But supposing victory favours the right side； let us consider a conqueror in a lawful war； and see what power he gets； and over whom。 First； It is plain he gets no power by his conquest over those that conquered with him。 They that fought on his side cannot suffer by the conquest； but must at least be as much freemen as they were before。 And most commonly they serve upon terms； and on condition to share with their leader； and enjoy a part of the spoil； and other advantages that attend the conquering sword； or at least have a part of the subdued country bestowed upon them。 And the conquering people are not； I hope； to be slaves by conquest； and wear their laurels only to shew they are sacrifices to their leaders triumph。 They that found absolute monarchy upon the title of the sword； make their heroes； who are the founders of such monarchies； arrant Draw…can…sirs； and forget they had any officers and soldiers that fought on their side in the battles they won； or assisted them in the subduing； or shared in possessing； the countries they mastered。 We are told by some； that the English monarchy is founded in the Norman conquest； and that our princes have thereby a title to absolute dominion： which if it were true； （as by the history it appears otherwise） and that William had a right to make war on this island； yet his dominion by conquest could reach no farther than to the Saxons and Britons； that were then inhabitants of this country。 The Normans that came with him； and helped to conquer； and all descended from them； are freemen； and no subjects by conquest； let that give what dominion it will。 And if 1； or any body else； shall claim freedom； as derived from them； it will be very hard to prove the contrary： and it is plain； the law； that has made no distinction between the one and the other； intends not there should be any difference in their freedom or privileges。 Sec。 178。 But supposing； which seldom happens； that the conquerors and conquered never incorporate into one people； under the same laws and freedom； let us see next what power a lawful conqueror has over the subdued： and that I say is purely despotical。 He has an absolute power over the lives of those who by an unjust war have forfeited them； but not over the lives or fortunes of those who engaged not in the war； nor over the possessions even of those who were actually engaged in it。 Sec。 179。 Secondly； I say then the conqueror gets no power but only over those who have actually assisted； concurred； or consented to that unjust force that is used against him： for the people having given to their governors no power to do an unjust thing； such as is to make an unjust war； （for they never had such a power in themselves） they ought not to be charged as guilty of the violence and unjustice that is committed in an unjust war； any farther than they actually abet it； no more than they are to be thought guilty of any violence or oppression their governors
should use upon the people themselves； or any part of their fellow subjects； they having empowered them no more to the one than to the other。 Conquerors； it is true； seldom trouble themselves to make the distinction； but they willingly permit the confusion of war to sweep all together： but yet this alters not the right； for the conquerors power over the lives of the conquered； being only because they have used force to do； or maintain an injustice； he can have that power only over those who have concurred in that force； all the rest are innocent； and he has no more title over the people of that country； who have done him no injury； and so have made no forfeiture of their lives； than he has over any other； who； without any injuries or provocations； have lived upon fair terms with him。 Sec。 180。 Thirdly； The power a conqueror gets over those he overcomes in a just war； is perfectly despotical： he has an absolute power over the lives of those； who； by putting themselves in a state of war； have forfeited them； but he has not thereby a right and title to their possessions。 This I doubt not； but at first sight will seem a strange doctrine； it being so quite contrary to the practice of the world； there being nothing