嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
湘弼慕汐 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

a record of buddhistic kingdoms(倹脅芝村)-及3嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




;the eastern Tsin dynasty; ��A。D。 317´419���察�and sometimes to ;the Sung�察─�

that is�察�the Sung dynasty of the House of Liu ��A。D。 420´478��。 If he became 

a full monk at the age of twenty�察�and went to India when he was twenty´ 

five�察�his long life may have been divided pretty equally between the two 

dynasties。 

     2。   If   there   were   ever   another   and   larger   account   of   Fa´hien's   travels 

than the narrative of which a translation is now given�察�it has long ceased to 



                                                 8 


´ Page 9´

                          A RECORD OF BUDDHISTIC KINGDOMS 



be in existence。 

     In the Catalogue of the imperial library of the Suy dynasty ��A。D。 589´ 

618���察  �the   name   Fa´hien   occurs   four   times。   Towards   the   end   of   the   last 

section   of   it   ��page   22���察  �after   a   reference   to   his   travels�察  �his   labours   in 

translation   at   Kin´ling   ��another   name   for   Nanking���察  �in   conjunction   with 

Buddha´bhadra�察�are described。 In the second section�察�page 15�察�we find ;A 

Record   of   Buddhistic   Kingdoms�察�with   a   note�察  �saying   that   it   was   the 

work      of   the   ;Sramana�察     �Fa´hien�察─    �and    again�察   �on   page     13�察  �we    have 

;Narrative of Fa´hien in two Books�察─�and ;Narrative of Fa´hien's Travels 

in one Book。; But all these three entries may possibly belong to different 

copies   of   the   same   work�察  �the   first   and   the   other   two   being   in   separate 

subdivisions of the Catalogue。 

     In the two Chinese copies of the narrative in my possession the title is 

;Record   of   Buddhistic   Kingdoms。;   In   the   Japanese   or   Corean   recension 

subjoined   to   this   translation�察  �the   title   is   twofold�察  �first�察   �Narrative   of   the 

Distinguished        Monk�察    �Fa´hien�察─    �and    then�察  �more    at  large�察   �Incidents     of 

Travels in India�察�by the Sramana of the Eastern Tsin�察�Fa´hien�察�recorded by 

himself。; 

     There is still earlier attestation of the existence of our little work than 

the Suy Catalogue。 The Catalogue Raisonne of the imperial library of the 

present   dynasty   ��chap。   71��   mentions   two   quotations   from   it   by   Le   Tao´ 

yuen�察�a geographical writer of the dynasty of the Northern Wei ��A。D。 386´ 

584���察  �one   of   them   containing   89   characters�察  �and   the   other   276�察  �both   of 

them given as from the ;Narrative of Fa´hien。; 

     In   all   catalogues   subsequent   to   that   of   Suy   our   work   appears。   The 

evidence for its authenticity and genuineness is all that could be required。 

It   is   clear   to   myself   that   the   ;Record   of   Buddhistic   Kingdoms;   and   the 

;Narrative   of   his   Travels   by   Fa´hien;   were   designations   of   one   and   the 

same work�察�and that it is doubtful whether any larger work on the same 

subject     was     ever   current。    With     regard    to   the   text   subjoined     to   my 

translation�察�it was published in Japan in 1779。 The editor had before him 

four   recensions   of   the   narrative�察  �those   of   the   Sung   and   Ming   dynasties�察�

with appendixes on the names of certain characters in them�察�that of Japan�察�

and     that  of   Corea。    He    wisely    adopted     the   Corean     text�察  �published     in 



                                                   9 


´ Page 10´

                         A RECORD OF BUDDHISTIC KINGDOMS 



accordance with a royal rescript in 1726�察�so far as I can make out�察�but the 

different readings of the other texts are all given in top´notes�察�instead of 

foot´notes as with us�察�this being one of the points in which customs in the 

east and west go by contraries。 Very occasionally�察�the editor indicates by a 

single   character�察  �equivalent   to   ;right;   or   ;wrong�察─  �which   reading   in   his 

opinion is to be preferred。 In the notes to the present republication of the 

Corean text�察�S stands for Sung�察�M for Ming�察�and J for Japanese�察�R for right�察�

and W for wrong。 I have taken the trouble to give all the various readings 

��amounting to more than 300���察�partly as a curiosity and to make my text 

complete�察  �and      partly   to  show    how�察  �in  the   transcription    of  writings    in 

whatever language�察�such variations are sure to occur�察�

         ;maculae�察      �quas   aut   incuria   fudit�察    �Aut     humana     parum     cavit 

nature�察─�

     while    on   the   whole    they   very   slightly   affect   the   meaning     of  the 

document。 

     The   editors   of   the   Catalogue   Raisonne   intimate   their   doubts   of   the 

good taste and reliability of all Fa´hien's statements。 It offends them that 

he should call central India the ;Middle Kingdom�察─�and China�察�which to 

them   was   the   true   and   only   Middle   Kingdom�察  �but   ;a   Border   land�察�it 

offends them as the vaunting language of a Buddhist writer�察�whereas the 

reader will see in the expressions only an instance of what Fa´hien calls 

his ;simple straightforwardness。; 

     As   an   instance   of   his   unreliability   they   refer   to   his   account   of   the 

Buddhism        of  Khoten�察    �whereas     it  is  well   known�察    �they   say�察  �that   the 

Khoteners   from   ancient   times   till   now   have   been   Mohammedans��as   if 

they could have been so 170 years before Mohammed was born�察�and 222 

years   before   the   year   of   the   Hegira� �And   this   is   criticism  in   China。   The 

Catalogue was ordered by the K'ien´lung emperor in 1722。 Between three 

and four hundred of the ;Great Scholars; of the empire were engaged on it 

in   various    departments�察     �and   thus   egregiously     ignorant    did   they   show 

themselves of all beyond the limits of their own country�察�and even of the 

literature of that country itself。 

     Much      of  what    Fa´hien    tells  his  readers   of   Buddhist     miracles    and 

legends is indeed unreliable and grotesque�察�but we have from him the truth 



                                                10 


´ Page 11´

                         A RECORD OF BUDDHISTIC KINGDOMS 



as to what he saw and heard。 

     3。   In   concluding   this   introduction   I   wish   to   call   attention   to   some 

estimates   of   the   number   of   Buddhists   in   the   world   which   have   become 

current�察�believing�察�as I do�察�that the smallest of them is much above what is 

correct。 

     i。 In a note on the first page of his work on the Bhilsa Topes ��1854���察�

General   Cunningham   says�此   �The   Christians   number   about   270   millions�察�

the Buddhists about 222 millions�察�who are distributed as follows�此�China 

170 millions�察�Japan 25�察�Anam 14�察�Siam 3�察�Ava 8�察�Nepal 1�察�and Ceylon 1�察�

total�察�222 millions。; 

     ii。 In his article on M。 J。 Barthelemy Saint Hilaire's ;Le Bouddha et sa 

Religion�察─  �republished   in   his   ;Chips   from   a   German   Workshop�察─  �vol。   i。 

��1868���察 �Professor   Max   Muller   ��p。   215��  says�察   �The   young   prince   became 

the founder of a religion which�察�after more than two thousand years�察�is still 

professed by 455 millions of human beings�察─�and he appends the following 

note�此 �Though truth is not settled by majorities�察�it would be interesting to 

know which religion counts at the present moment the largest numbers of 

believers。 Berghaus�察�in his 'Physical Atlas��' gives the following division of 

the human race according to religion��'Buddhists 31。2 per cent�察�Christians 

30。7�察�Mohammedans 15。7�察�Brahmanists 13。4�察�Heathens 8。7�察�and Jews 0。3。' 

As    Berghaus      does    not  distinguish     the   Buddhists     in   China    from    the 

followers   of   Confucius   and   Laotse�察  �the   first   place   on   the   scale   really 

belongs to Christianity。 It is difficult to say to what religion a man belongs�察�

as the same person may profess two or three。 The emperor himself�察�after 

sacrificing   according   to   the   ritual   of   Confucius�察  �visits   a  Tao´sse   temple�察�

and     afterwards     bows    before    an   image    of   Fo   in  a   Buddhist     chapel。 

��'Melanges Asiatiques de St。 Petersbourg��' vol。 ii。 p。 374。��; 

     iii。  Both    these   estimates    are  exceeded     by   Dr。   T。  W。   Rhys    Davids 

��intimating also the uncertainty of the statements�察�and that numbers are no 

evidence of truth�� in the introduction to his ;Manual of Buddhism。; The 

Buddhists there appear as amounting in all to 500 millions��30 millions of 

Southern   Buddhists�察  �in   Ceylon�察  �Burma�察  �Siam�察 �Anam�察  �and   India   ��Jains���察�

and   470   millions   of   North   Buddhists�察  �of   whom   nearly   33   millions   are 

assigned   to   Japan�察  �and   414��686��974   to   the   eighteen   provinces   of   China 



                                                11 


´ Page 12´

                         A RECORD OF BUDDHISTIC KINGDOMS 



proper。   According       to  him�察  �Christians   am
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��