嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
湘弼慕汐 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

theologico-political treatise p2(舞僥嚥屓嵶廨籾冩梢2)-及13嫗

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




applied by very skilful philosophers�察�but should be adapted to the natural 

and   ordinary   faculties   and   capacity   of   mankind。   ��197�� And   such   I   have 

shown our   method to   be�察 �for   such   difficulties   as   it   has   arise   from  men's 

carelessness�察�and are no part of its nature。 



                                                 40 


´ Page 41´

                             A Theologico´Political Treatise Part 2 



                            CHAPTER VIII。 



     OF THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE PENTATEUCH AND THE OTHER 

HISTORICAL BOOKS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT 

     ��1�� In the former chapter we treated of the foundations and principles 

of    Scriptural    knowledge�察      �and   showed      that   it  consists   solely    in   a 

trustworthy   history   of   the   sacred   writings�察  �such   a   history�察  �in   spite   of   its 

indispensability�察�the ancients neglected�察�or at any rate�察�whatever they may 

have     written    or  handed     down     has    perished    in   the   lapse   of   time�察�

consequently the groundwork for such an investigation is to a great extent�察�

cut from under us。 ��2�� This might be put up with if succeeding generations 

had confined themselves within the limits of truth�察�and had handed down 

conscientiously       what   few    particulars   they   had   received    or   discovered 

without   any   additions   from   their   own   brains�此  �as   it   is�察  �the   history   of   the 

Bible is not so much imperfect as untrustworthy�此�the foundations are not 

only too scanty for building upon�察�but are also unsound。 ��3�� It is part of my 

purpose     to  remedy     these   defects�察  �and   to  remove     common      theological 

prejudices。 ��4�� But I fear that I am attempting my task too late�察�for men 

have   arrived   at   the   pitch   of   not   suffering   contradiction�察  �but   defending 

obstinately whatever they have adopted under the name of religion。 ��5�� So 

widely have these prejudices taken possession of men's   minds�察�that very 

few�察  �comparatively   speaking�察  �will   listen   to   reason。   ��6��   However�察  �I   will 

make the attempt�察�and spare no efforts�察�for there is no positive reason for 

despairing of success。 

     ��7��   In   order   to   treat   the   subject   methodically�察  �I   will   begin   with   the 

received opinions concerning the true authors of the sacred books�察�and in 

the   first  place�察  �speak   of  the   author   of  the   Pentateuch�察   �who    is  almost 

universally supposed to have been Moses。 ��8�� The Pharisees are so firmly 

convinced of his identity�察�that they account as a heretic anyone who differs 

from them on the subject。 ��9�� Wherefore�察�Aben Ezra�察�a man of enlightened 

intelligence�察�and no small learning�察�who was the first�察�so far as I know�察�to 

treat of this opinion�察�dared not express his meaning openly�察�but confined 

himself to dark hints which I shall not scruple to elucidate�察�thus throwing�察�

full light on the subject。 



                                             41 


´ Page 42´

                             A Theologico´Political Treatise Part 2 



     ��10��   The   words   of   Aben      Ezra   which   occur   in   his   commentary   on 

Deuteronomy are as follows�此 �Beyond Jordan�察�&c 。 。 。 If so be that thou 

understandest the mystery of the twelve 。 。 。               moreover Moses wrote the 

law 。 。 。    The Canaanite was then in the land 。 。 。 。 it shall be revealed on 

the mount of God 。 。 。 。 then also behold his bed�察�his iron bed�察�then shalt 

thou know the truth。; ��11�� In these few words he hints�察�and also shows that 

it was not Moses who wrote the Pentateuch�察�but someone who lived long 

after him�察 �and   further�察 �that the   book   which   Moses   wrote  was   something 

different from any now extant。 

     ��12�� To prove this�察�I say�察�he draws attention to the facts�此�

     ��13�� 1。 That the preface to Deuteronomy could not have been written 

by Moses�察�inasmuch as he ad never crossed the Jordan。 

     ��14�� II。 That the whole book of Moses was written at full length on the 

circumference of a single altar ��Deut。 xxvii�察�and Josh。 viii��37���察�which altar�察�

according   to   the   Rabbis�察  �consisted   of   only   twelve   stones�此  �therefore   the 

book of Moses must have been of far less extent than the Pentateuch。 ��15�� 

This   is   what   our   author   means�察  �I   think�察  �by   the   mystery   of   the   twelve�察�

unless   he   is   referring   to   the   twelve   curses   contained   in   the   chapter   of 

Deuteronomy         above     cited�察  �which     he   thought     could    not   have    been 

contained in the law�察�because Moses bade the Levites read them after the 

recital of the law�察�and so bind the people to its observance。 ��16�� Or again�察�

he may have had in his mind the last chapter of Deuteronomy which treats 

of the death of Moses�察�and which contains twelve verses。 ��17�� But there is 

no need to dwell further on these and similar conjectures。 

     ��18�� III。 That in Deut。 xxxi��9�察�the expression occurs�察 �and Moses wrote 

the law�此─  �words   that   cannot   be   ascribed   to   Moses�察  �but   must   be   those   of 

some other writer narrating the deeds and writings of Moses。 

     ��19��    IV。  That    in  Genesis     xii��6�察 �the   historian�察   �after  narrating    that 

Abraham journeyed through the and of Canaan�察�adds�察 �and the Canaanite 

was then in the land�察─�thus clearly excluding the time at which he wrote。 

��20�� So that this passage must have been written after the death of Moses�察�

when   the   Canaanites   had   been   driven   out�察  �and   no   longer   possessed   the 

land。 

     ��21��   Aben   Ezra�察  �in   his   commentary   on   the   passage�察  �alludes   to   the 



                                              42 


´ Page 43´

                              A Theologico´Political Treatise Part 2 



difficulty as follows�此� ;And the Canaanite was then in the land�此�it appears 

that   Canaan�察  �the   grandson   of   Noah�察  �took   from   another   the   land   which 

bears his name�察�if this be not the true meaning�察�there lurks some mystery 

in the passage�察�and let him who understands it keep silence。; ��22�� That is�察�

if Canaan invaded those regions�察�the sense will be�察�the Canaanite was then 

in   the   land�察  �in   contradistinction   to   the   time   when   it   had   been   held   by 

another�此  �but   if�察  �as   follows   from   Gen。   chap。   x。   Canaan   was   the   first   to 

inhabit the land�察�the text must mean to exclude the time present�察�that is the 

time at which it was written�察�therefore it cannot be the work of Moses�察�in 

whose   time   the   Canaanites   still   possessed   those   territories�此  �this   is        the 

mystery concerning which silence is recommended。 

     ��23�� V。 That in Genesis xxii��14 Mount Moriah is called the mount of 

God�察。�Endnote 9�В察�a name which it did not acquire till after the building of 

the Temple�察�the choice of the mountain was not made in the time of Moses�察�

for Moses does not point out any spot as chosen by God�察�on the contrary�察�

he foretells that God will at some future time choose a spot to which this 

name will be given。 

     ��24�� VI。 Lastly�察�that in Deut。 chap。 iii。�察�in the passage relating to Og�察�

king   of   Bashan�察  �these   words   are  inserted�此   �For   only  Og   king   of   Bashan 

remained of the remnant of giants�此�behold�察�his bedstead was a bedstead of 

iron�此�is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon�拭�nine cubits was the 

length thereof�察�and four cubits the breadth of it�察�after the cubit of a man。; 

��25��  This   parenthesis   most   plainly   shows   that   its   writer   lived   long   after 

Moses�察  �for   this   mode   of   speaking   is   only   employed   by   one   treating   of 

things long past�察�and pointing to relics for the sake of gaining credence�此�

moreover�察  �this   bed   was   almost   certainly   first   discovered   by   David�察  �who 

conquered the city of Rabbath ��2 Sam。 xii��30。�� ��26�� Again�察�the historian a 

little   further    on   inserts   after   the   words    of   Moses�察     �Jair�察  �the   son   of 

Manasseh�察�took all   the country  of Argob unto  the coasts   of Geshuri   and 

Maachathi�察�and called them after his own name�察�Bashan´havoth´jair�察�unto 

this   day。;   ��27��   This   passage�察  �I   say�察  �is   inserted   to   explain   the   words   of 

Moses   which   precede   it。   ��28��   ;And   the   rest   of   Gilead�察  �and   all   Bashan�察�

being the kingdom of Og�察�gave I unto the half tribe of Manasseh�察�all the 

region of Argob�察�with all Bashan�察�which is called the land of the giants。; 



                                               43 


´ Page 44´

                              A Theologico´Political Treatise Part 2 



��29��    The    Hebrews      in  the   time   of  the   writer   indisputably      knew     what 

territories belonged to the tribe of Judah�察�but did not know them under the 

name of the jurisdiction of Argob�察�or the land of the giants。 ��30�� Therefore 
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��