ÓÑÇéÌáʾ£ºÈç¹û±¾ÍøÒ³´ò¿ªÌ«Âý»òÏÔʾ²»ÍêÕû£¬Çë³¢ÊÔÊó±êÓÒ¼ü¡°Ë¢Ð¡±±¾ÍøÒ³£¡ÔĶÁ¹ý³Ì·¢ÏÖÈκδíÎóÇë¸æËßÎÒÃÇ£¬Ð»Ð»£¡£¡ ±¨¸æ´íÎó
¾ÅÉ«Êé¼® ·µ»Ø±¾ÊéĿ¼ ÎÒµÄÊé¼Ü ÎÒµÄÊéÇ© TXTÈ«±¾ÏÂÔØ ½øÈëÊé°É ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©

darwin and modern science-µÚ128ÕÂ

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡first¡¡were¡¡obviously¡¡superior¡¡to¡¡the¡¡latter¡£

Darwin¡¡was¡¡surprised¡¡by¡¡this¡¡observation£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡had¡¡expected¡¡a¡¡prejudicial¡¡influence¡¡of¡¡self¡­fertilisation¡¡to¡¡manifest¡¡itself¡¡after¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡generations£º¡¡¡¡¡¨I¡¡always¡¡supposed¡¡until¡¡lately¡¡that¡¡no¡¡evil¡¡effects¡¡would¡¡be¡¡visible¡¡until¡¡after¡¡several¡¡generations¡¡of¡¡self¡­fertilisation£»¡¡but¡¡now¡¡I¡¡see¡¡that¡¡one¡¡generation¡¡sometimes¡¡suffices¡¡and¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡dimorphic¡¡plants¡¡and¡¡all¡¡the¡¡wonderful¡¡contrivances¡¡of¡¡orchids¡¡are¡¡quite¡¡intelligible¡¡to¡¡me¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨More¡¡Letters¡¨£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡II¡£¡¡page¡¡373¡££©

The¡¡observations¡¡on¡¡Linaria¡¡and¡¡the¡¡investigations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡results¡¡of¡¡legitimate¡¡and¡¡illegitimate¡¡fertilisation¡¡in¡¡heterostyled¡¡plants¡¡were¡¡apparently¡¡the¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡a¡¡long¡¡series¡¡of¡¡experiments¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡were¡¡concerned¡¡with¡¡plants¡¡of¡¡different¡¡families¡¡and¡¡led¡¡to¡¡results¡¡which¡¡are¡¡of¡¡fundamental¡¡importance¡¡for¡¡a¡¡true¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡sexual¡¡reproduction¡£

The¡¡experiments¡¡were¡¡so¡¡arranged¡¡that¡¡plants¡¡were¡¡shielded¡¡from¡¡insect¡­¡¡visits¡¡by¡¡a¡¡net¡£¡¡¡¡Some¡¡flowers¡¡were¡¡then¡¡pollinated¡¡with¡¡their¡¡own¡¡pollen£»¡¡others¡¡with¡¡pollen¡¡from¡¡another¡¡plant¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡species¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡seeds¡¡were¡¡germinated¡¡on¡¡moist¡¡sand£»¡¡two¡¡seedlings¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡age£»¡¡one¡¡from¡¡a¡¡cross¡¡and¡¡the¡¡other¡¡from¡¡a¡¡self¡­fertilised¡¡flower£»¡¡were¡¡selected¡¡and¡¡planted¡¡on¡¡opposite¡¡sides¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡pot¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡grew¡¡therefore¡¡under¡¡identical¡¡external¡¡conditions£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡compare¡¡their¡¡peculiarities¡¡such¡¡as¡¡height£»¡¡weight£»¡¡fruiting¡¡capacity£»¡¡etc¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡other¡¡cases¡¡the¡¡seedlings¡¡were¡¡placed¡¡near¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another¡¡in¡¡the¡¡open¡¡and¡¡in¡¡this¡¡way¡¡their¡¡capacity¡¡of¡¡resisting¡¡unfavourable¡¡external¡¡conditions¡¡was¡¡tested¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡experiments¡¡were¡¡in¡¡some¡¡cases¡¡continued¡¡to¡¡the¡¡tenth¡¡generation¡¡and¡¡the¡¡flowers¡¡were¡¡crossed¡¡in¡¡different¡¡ways¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡see£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡that¡¡this¡¡book¡¡also¡¡represents¡¡an¡¡enormous¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡most¡¡careful¡¡and¡¡patient¡¡original¡¡work¡£

The¡¡general¡¡result¡¡obtained¡¡is¡¡that¡¡plants¡¡produced¡¡as¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡cross¡­¡¡fertilisation¡¡are¡¡superior£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡cases£»¡¡to¡¡those¡¡produced¡¡as¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡self¡­fertilisation£»¡¡in¡¡height£»¡¡resistance¡¡to¡¡external¡¡injurious¡¡influences£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡seed¡­production¡£

Ipomoea¡¡purpurea¡¡may¡¡be¡¡quoted¡¡as¡¡an¡¡example¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡we¡¡express¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡cross¡­fertilisation¡¡by¡¡100£»¡¡we¡¡obtain¡¡the¡¡following¡¡numbers¡¡for¡¡the¡¡fertilised¡¡plants¡£

Generation¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Height¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Number¡¡of¡¡seeds¡£

1¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡76¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡64¡¡2¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡79¡¡¡¡¡¡¡­¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡68¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡94¡¡4¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡86¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡94¡¡5¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡75¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡89¡¡6¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡72¡¡¡¡¡¡¡­¡¡7¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡81¡¡¡¡¡¡¡­¡¡8¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡85¡¡¡¡¡¡¡­¡¡9¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡79¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡26¡¡£¨Number¡¡of¡¡capsules£©¡¡10¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡£º¡¡54¡¡¡¡¡¡¡­

Taking¡¡the¡¡average£»¡¡the¡¡ratio¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡growth¡¡is¡¡100£º77¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡considerable¡¡superiority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡crossed¡¡plants¡¡is¡¡apparent¡¡in¡¡the¡¡first¡¡generation¡¡and¡¡is¡¡not¡¡increased¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡generations£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡some¡¡fluctuation¡¡about¡¡the¡¡average¡¡ratio¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡numbers¡¡representing¡¡the¡¡fertility¡¡of¡¡crossed¡¡and¡¡self¡­fertilised¡¡plants¡¡are¡¡more¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡compare¡¡with¡¡accuracy£»¡¡the¡¡superiority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡crossed¡¡plants¡¡is¡¡chiefly¡¡explained¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡they¡¡produce¡¡a¡¡much¡¡larger¡¡number¡¡of¡¡capsules£»¡¡not¡¡because¡¡there¡¡are¡¡on¡¡the¡¡average¡¡more¡¡seeds¡¡in¡¡each¡¡capsule¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡ratio¡¡of¡¡the¡¡capsules¡¡was£»¡¡e¡£g¡£¡¡in¡¡the¡¡third¡¡generation£»¡¡100£º38£»¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡seeds¡¡in¡¡the¡¡capsules¡¡100£º94¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡also¡¡especially¡¡noteworthy¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡self¡­fertilised¡¡plants¡¡the¡¡anthers¡¡were¡¡smaller¡¡and¡¡contained¡¡a¡¡smaller¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡pollen£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡eighth¡¡generation¡¡the¡¡reduced¡¡fertility¡¡showed¡¡itself¡¡in¡¡a¡¡form¡¡which¡¡is¡¡often¡¡found¡¡in¡¡hybrids£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡the¡¡first¡¡flowers¡¡were¡¡sterile¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Complete¡¡sterility¡¡was¡¡not¡¡found¡¡in¡¡any¡¡of¡¡the¡¡plants¡¡investigated¡¡by¡¡Darwin¡£¡¡¡¡Others¡¡appear¡¡to¡¡be¡¡more¡¡sensitive£»¡¡Cluer¡¡found¡¡Zea¡¡Mais¡¡¡¨almost¡¡sterile¡¨¡¡after¡¡three¡¡generations¡¡of¡¡self¡­fertilisation¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨Cf¡£¡¡Fruwirth£»¡¡¡¨Die¡¡Zuchtung¡¡der¡¡Landwirtschaftlichen¡¡Kulturpflanzen¡¨£»¡¡Berlin£»¡¡1904£»¡¡II¡£¡¡page¡¡6¡££©

The¡¡superiority¡¡of¡¡crossed¡¡individuals¡¡is¡¡not¡¡exhibited¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡way¡¡in¡¡all¡¡plants¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡example¡¡in¡¡Eschscholzia¡¡californica¡¡the¡¡crossed¡¡seedlings¡¡do¡¡not¡¡exceed¡¡the¡¡self¡­fertilised¡¡in¡¡height¡¡and¡¡vigour£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡crossing¡¡considerably¡¡increases¡¡the¡¡plant's¡¡capacity¡¡for¡¡flower¡­production£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡seedlings¡¡from¡¡such¡¡a¡¡mother¡­plant¡¡are¡¡more¡¡fertile¡£

The¡¡conception¡¡implied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡term¡¡crossing¡¡requires¡¡a¡¡closer¡¡analysis¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡in¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡plants£»¡¡a¡¡large¡¡number¡¡of¡¡flowers¡¡are¡¡in¡¡bloom¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡on¡¡one¡¡and¡¡the¡¡same¡¡plant£»¡¡it¡¡follows¡¡that¡¡insects¡¡visiting¡¡the¡¡flowers¡¡often¡¡carry¡¡pollen¡¡from¡¡one¡¡flower¡¡to¡¡another¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡stock¡£¡¡¡¡Has¡¡this¡¡method£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡as¡¡Geitonogamy£»¡¡the¡¡same¡¡influence¡¡as¡¡crossing¡¡with¡¡pollen¡¡from¡¡another¡¡plant£¿¡¡¡¡The¡¡results¡¡of¡¡Darwin's¡¡experiments¡¡with¡¡different¡¡plants¡¡£¨Ipomoea¡¡purpurea£»¡¡Digitalis¡¡purpurea£»¡¡Mimulus¡¡luteus£»¡¡Pelargonium£»¡¡Origanum£©¡¡were¡¡not¡¡in¡¡complete¡¡agreement£»¡¡but¡¡on¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡they¡¡pointed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡Geitonogamy¡¡shows¡¡no¡¡superiority¡¡over¡¡self¡­fertilisation¡¡£¨Autogamy£©¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Similarly¡¡crossing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡flowers¡¡of¡¡Pelargonium¡¡zonale£»¡¡which¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡plants¡¡raised¡¡from¡¡cuttings¡¡from¡¡the¡¡same¡¡parent£»¡¡shows¡¡no¡¡superiority¡¡over¡¡self¡­¡¡fertilisation¡££©¡¡¡¡Darwin£»¡¡however£»¡¡considered¡¡it¡¡possible¡¡that¡¡this¡¡may¡¡sometimes¡¡be¡¡the¡¡case¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡sexual¡¡elements¡¡in¡¡the¡¡flowers¡¡on¡¡the¡¡same¡¡plant¡¡can¡¡rarely¡¡have¡¡been¡¡differentiated£»¡¡though¡¡this¡¡is¡¡possible£»¡¡as¡¡flower¡­buds¡¡are¡¡in¡¡one¡¡sense¡¡distinct¡¡individuals£»¡¡sometimes¡¡varying¡¡and¡¡differing¡¡from¡¡one¡¡another¡¡in¡¡structure¡¡or¡¡constitution¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Cross¡¡and¡¡Self¡¡fertilisation¡¨¡¡£¨1st¡¡edition£©£»¡¡page¡¡444¡££©

As¡¡regards¡¡the¡¡importance¡¡of¡¡this¡¡question¡¡from¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡the¡¡significance¡¡of¡¡cross¡­fertilisation¡¡in¡¡general£»¡¡it¡¡may¡¡be¡¡noted¡¡that¡¡later¡¡observers¡¡have¡¡definitely¡¡discovered¡¡a¡¡difference¡¡between¡¡the¡¡results¡¡of¡¡autogamy¡¡and¡¡geitonogamy¡£¡¡¡¡Gilley¡¡and¡¡Fruwirth¡¡found¡¡that¡¡in¡¡Brassica¡¡Napus£»¡¡the¡¡length¡¡and¡¡weight¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fruits¡¡as¡¡also¡¡the¡¡total¡¡weight¡¡of¡¡the¡¡seeds¡¡in¡¡a¡¡single¡¡fruit¡¡were¡¡less¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡autogamy¡¡than¡¡in¡¡geitonogamy¡£¡¡¡¡With¡¡Sinapis¡¡alba¡¡a¡¡better¡¡crop¡¡of¡¡seeds¡¡was¡¡obtained¡¡after¡¡geitonogamy£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Sugar¡¡Beet¡¡the¡¡average¡¡weight¡¡of¡¡a¡¡fruit¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡a¡¡self¡­fertilised¡¡plant¡¡was¡¡0¡£009¡¡gr¡££»¡¡from¡¡geitonogamy¡¡0¡£012¡¡gr¡££»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡cross¡­fertilisation¡¡0¡£013¡¡gr¡£

On¡¡the¡¡whole£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡results¡¡of¡¡geitonogamy¡¡show¡¡that¡¡the¡¡favourable¡¡effects¡¡of¡¡cross¡­fertilisation¡¡do¡¡not¡¡depend¡¡simply¡¡on¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡pollen¡¡of¡¡one¡¡flower¡¡is¡¡conveyed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡stigma¡¡of¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡the¡¡plants¡¡which¡¡are¡¡crossed¡¡must¡¡in¡¡some¡¡way¡¡be¡¡different¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡plants¡¡of¡¡Ipomoea¡¡purpurea¡¡£¨and¡¡Mimulus¡¡luteus£©¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡self¡­fertilised¡¡for¡¡seven¡¡generations¡¡and¡¡grown¡¡under¡¡the¡¡same¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡cultivation¡¡are¡¡crossed¡¡together£»¡¡the¡¡plants¡¡so¡¡crossed¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡superior¡¡to¡¡the¡¡self¡­¡¡fertilised£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand¡¡crossing¡¡with¡¡a¡¡fresh¡¡stock¡¡at¡¡once¡¡proves¡¡very¡¡advantageous¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡favourable¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡crossing¡¡is¡¡only¡¡apparent£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡if¡¡the¡¡parent¡¡plants¡¡are¡¡grown¡¡under¡¡different¡¡conditions¡¡or¡¡if¡¡they¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡different¡¡varieties¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨It¡¡is¡¡really¡¡wonderful¡¡what¡¡an¡¡effect¡¡pollen¡¡from¡¡a¡¡distinct¡¡seedling¡¡plant£»¡¡which¡¡has¡¡been¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡different¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡life£»¡¡has¡¡on¡¡the¡¡offspring¡¡in¡¡comparison¡¡with¡¡pollen¡¡from¡¡the¡¡same¡¡flower¡¡or¡¡from¡¡a¡¡distinct¡¡individual£»¡¡but¡¡which¡¡has¡¡been¡¡long¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡the¡¡same¡¡conditions¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡subject¡¡bears¡¡on¡¡the¡¡very¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡life£»¡¡which¡¡seems¡¡almost¡¡to¡¡require¡¡changes¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conditions¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨More¡¡Letters¡¨£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡II¡£¡¡page¡¡406¡££©

The¡¡fertilitymeasured¡¡by¡¡the¡¡number¡¡or¡¡weight¡¡of¡¡the¡¡seeds¡¡produced¡¡by¡¡an¡¡equal¡¡number¡¡of¡¡plantsnoticed¡¡under¡¡different¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡fertilisation¡¡may¡¡be¡¡quoted¡¡in¡¡illustration¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡On¡¡crossing¡¡¡¡¡¡On¡¡crossing¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡On¡¡self¡­¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡a¡¡fresh¡¡¡¡plants¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¡fertilisation¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡stock¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡same¡¡stock¡¡Mimuleus¡¡luteus¡¡¡¡£¨First¡¡and¡¡ninth¡¡generation£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡4¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡3

Eschscholzia¡¡californica¡¡¡¡£¨second¡¡generation£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡45¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡40

Dianthus¡¡caryophyllus¡¡¡¡£¨third¡¡and¡¡fourth¡¡generation£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡45¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡33

Petunia¡¡violacea¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡100¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡54¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡46

Crossing¡¡under¡¡very¡¡similar¡¡conditions¡¡shows£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡difference¡¡between¡¡the¡¡sexual¡¡cells¡¡is¡¡smaller¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡crossing¡¡is¡¡only¡¡slightly¡¡superior¡¡to¡¡that¡¡given¡¡by¡¡self¡­fertilisation¡£¡¡¡¡Is£»¡¡then£»¡¡the¡¡favourable¡¡result¡¡of¡¡crossing¡¡with¡¡a¡¡foreign¡¡stock¡¡to¡¡be¡¡attributed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡this¡¡belongs¡¡to¡¡another¡¡systematic¡¡entity¡¡or¡¡to¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡plants£»¡¡though¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡same¡¡entity¡¡were¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡different¡¡conditions£¿¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡a¡¡point¡¡on¡¡which¡¡further¡¡researches¡¡must¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡into¡¡account£»¡¡especially¡¡since¡¡the¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡systematic¡¡entities¡¡has¡¡been¡¡much¡¡more¡¡thorough¡¡than¡¡formerly¡£¡¡¡¡£¨In¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡garden¡¡plants£»¡¡as¡¡Darwin¡¡to¡¡a¡¡large¡¡extent¡¡claimed£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡easy¡¡to¡¡say¡¡whether¡¡two¡¡individuals¡¡really¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡the¡¡same¡¡variety£»¡¡as¡¡they¡¡are¡¡usually¡¡of¡¡hybrid¡¡origin¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡some¡¡instances¡¡£¨Petunia£»¡¡Iberis£©¡¡the¡¡fresh¡¡stock¡¡employed¡¡by¡¡Darwin¡¡possessed¡¡flowers¡¡differing¡¡in¡¡colour¡¡from¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡plant¡¡crossed¡¡with¡¡it¡££©¡¡¡¡We¡¡know¡¡that¡¡most¡¡of¡¡Linneaus's¡¡species¡¡are¡¡compound¡¡species£»¡¡frequently¡¡consisting¡¡of¡¡a¡¡very¡¡large¡¡number¡¡of¡¡smaller¡¡or¡¡elementary¡¡species¡¡former
·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©
δÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
ÎÂÜ°Ìáʾ£º ο´Ð¡ËµµÄͬʱ·¢±íÆÀÂÛ£¬Ëµ³ö×Ô¼ºµÄ¿´·¨ºÍÆäËüС»ï°éÃÇ·ÖÏíÒ²²»´íŶ£¡·¢±íÊéÆÀ»¹¿ÉÒÔ»ñµÃ»ý·ÖºÍ¾­Ñé½±Àø£¬ÈÏÕæдԭ´´ÊéÆÀ ±»²ÉÄÉΪ¾«ÆÀ¿ÉÒÔ»ñµÃ´óÁ¿½ð±Ò¡¢»ý·ÖºÍ¾­Ñé½±ÀøŶ£¡