按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
government。
Ambition is pernicious in a republic。 But in a monarchy it has some good effects； it gives life to the government； and is attended with this advantage； that it is in no way dangerous； because it may be continually checked。
It is with this kind of government as with the system of the universe； in which there is a power that constantly repels all bodies from the centre； and a power of gravitation that attracts them to it。 Honour sets all the parts of the body politic in motion； and by its very action connects them； thus each individual advances the public good； while he only thinks of promoting his own interest。
True it is that； philosophically speaking； it is a false honour which moves all the parts of the government； but even this false honour is as useful to the public as true honour could possibly be to private persons。
Is it not very exacting to oblige men to perform the most difficult actions； such as require an extraordinary exertion of fortitude and resolution； without other recompense than that of glory and applause？
8。 That Honour is not the Principle of Despotic Government。 Honour is far from being the principle of despotic government： mankind being here all upon a level； no one person can prefer himself to another； and as on the other hand they are all slaves； they can give themselves no sort of preference。
Besides； as honour has its laws and rules； as it knows not how to submit； as it depends in a great measure on a man's own caprice； and not on that of another person； it can be found only in countries in which the constitution is fixed； and where they are governed by settled laws。
How can despotism abide with honour？ The one glories in the contempt of life； and the other is founded on the power of taking it away。 How can honour； on the other hand； bear with despotism？ The former has its fixed rules； and peculiar caprices； but the latter is directed by no rule； and its own caprices are subversive of all others。
Honour； therefore； a thing unknown in arbitrary governments； some of which have not even a proper word to express it；＇14＇ is the prevailing principle in monarchies； here it gives life to the whole body politic； to the laws； and even to the virtues themselves。
9。 Of the Principle of Despotic Government。 As virtue is necessary in a republic； and in a monarchy honour； so fear is necessary in a despotic government： with regard to virtue； there is no occasion for it； and honour would be extremely dangerous。
Here the immense power of the prince devolves entirely upon those whom he is pleased to entrust with the administration。 Persons capable of setting a value upon themselves would be likely to create disturbances。 Fear must therefore depress their spirits； and extinguish even the least sense of ambition。
A moderate government may； whenever it pleases； and without the least danger； relax its springs。 It supports itself by the laws； and by its own internal strength。 But when a despotic prince ceases for one single moment to uplift his arm； when he cannot instantly demolish those whom he has entrusted with the first employments；＇15＇ all is over： for as fear； the spring of this government； no longer subsists； the people are left without a protector。
It is probably in this sense the Cadis maintained that the Grand Seignior was not obliged to keep his word or oath； when he limited thereby his authority。＇16＇
It is necessary that the people should be judged by laws； and the great men by the caprice of the prince； that the lives of the lowest subject should be safe； and the pasha's head ever in danger。 We cannot mention these monstrous governments without horror。 The Sophi of Persia； dethroned in our days by Mahomet； the son of Miriveis； saw the constitution subverted before this resolution； because he had been too sparing of blood。＇17＇
History informs us that the horrid cruelties of Domitian struck such a terror into the governors that the people recovered themselves a little during his reign。＇18＇ Thus a torrent overflows one side of a country； and on the other leaves fields untouched； where the eye is refreshed by the prospect of fine meadows。
10。 Difference of Obedience in Moderate and Despotic Governments。 In despotic states； the nature of government requires the most passive obedience； and when once the prince's will is made known； it ought infallibly to produce its effect。
Here they have no limitations or restrictions； no mediums； terms； equivalents； or remonstrances； no change to propose： man is a creature that blindly submits to the absolute will of the sovereign。
In a country like this they are no more allowed to represent their apprehensions of a future danger than to impute their miscarriage to the capriciousness of fortune。 Man's portion here； like that of beasts； is instinct； compliance； and punishment。
Little does it then avail to plead the sentiments of nature； filial respect； conjugal or parental tenderness； the laws of honour； or want of health； the order is given； and； that is sufficient。
In Persia； when the king has condemned a person； it is no longer lawful to mention his name； or to intercede in his favour。 Even if the prince were intoxicated； or non compos； the decree must be executed；＇19＇ otherwise he would contradict himself； and the law admits of no contradiction。 This has been the way of thinking in that country in all ages； as the order which Ahasuerus gave； to exterminate the Jews； could not be revoked； they were allowed the liberty of defending themselves。
One thing； however； may be sometimes opposed to the prince's will；＇20＇ namely； religion。 They will abandon； nay they will slay a parent； if the prince so commands； but he cannot oblige them to drink wine。 The laws of religion are of a superior nature； because they bind the sovereign as well as the subject。 But with respect to the law of nature； it is otherwise； the prince is no longer supposed to be a man。
In monarchical and moderate states； the power is limited by its very spring； I mean by honour； which； like a monarch； reigns over the prince and his people。 They will not allege to their sovereign the laws of religion； a courtier would be apprehensive of rendering himself ridiculous。 But the laws of honour will be appealed to on all occasions。 Hence arise the restrictions necessary to obedience； honour is naturally subject to whims； by which the subject's submission will be ever directed。
Though the manner of obeying be different in these two kinds of government； the power is the same。 On which side soever the monarch turns； he inclines the scale； and is obeyed。 The whole difference is that in a monarchy the prince receives instruction； at the same time that his ministers have greater abilities； and are more versed in public affairs； than the ministers of a despotic government。
11。 Reflections on the preceding Chapters。 Such are the principles of the three sorts of government： which does not imply that in a particular republic they actually are； but that they ought to be； virtuous； nor does it prove that in a particular monarchy they are actuated by honour； or in a particular despotic government by fear； but that they ought to be directed by these principles； otherwise the government is imperfect。
______
1。 This is a very important distinction； whence I shall draw many consequences； for it is the key of an infinite number of laws。
2。 Cromwell。
3。 Plutarch； Pericles； Plato； in Critias。
4。 She had at that time twenty…one thousand citizens； ten thousand strangers； and four hundred thousand slaves。 See Athen？us； vi。
5。 She had then twenty thousand citizens。 See Demosthenes in Aristog。
6。 They had passed a law； which rendered it a capital crime for any one to propose applying the money designed for the theatres to military
7。 This lasted three years。
8。 Public crimes may be punished； because it is here a common concern； but private crimes will go unpunished； because it is the common interest not to punish them。
9。 I speak here of political virtue； which is also moral virtue as it is directed to the public good； very little of private moral virtue； and not at all of that virtue which relates to revealed truths。 This will appear better in v。 2。
10。 This is to be understood in the sense of the preceding note。
11。 We must not； says he； employ people of mean extraction； they are too rigid and morose。 Testament Polit。； 4。
12。 This word good man is understood here in a political sense only。
13。 See Footnote 1。
14。 See Perry； p。 447。
15。 As it often happens in a military aristocracy。
16。 Ricaut on the Ottoman Empire。 I； ii。
17。 See the history of this revolution by Father du Cerceau。
18。 Suetonius； Life of Domitian； viii。 His was a military constitution； which is one of the species of despotic government。
19。 See Sir John Chardin。
20。 Ibid。
Book IV。 That the Laws of Education Ought to Be in Relation to the Principles of Government
1。 Of the Laws of Education。 The laws of education are the first impressions we receive； and as they prepare us for civil life； every private family ought to be governed by the plan of that great household which comprehends them all。
If the people in general have a principle； the