按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
eculiarities and antecedents render considerable diversities desirable in the details of their government。 But if there is a real desire on all hands to make the experiment successful； there needs seldom be any difficulty in not only preserving these diversities； but giving them the guarantee of a constitutional provision against any attempt at assimilation； except by the voluntary act of those who would be affected by the change。 Chapter 18 Of the Government of Dependencies by a Free State。
FREE STATES； like all others； may possess dependencies； acquired either by conquest or by colonisation； and our own is the greatest instance of the kind in modern history。 It is a most important question how such dependencies ought to be governed。 It is unnecessary to discuss the case of small posts； like Gibraltar； Aden； or Heligoland； which are held only as naval or military positions。 The military or naval object is in this case paramount； and the inhabitants cannot； consistently with it； be admitted to the government of the place； though they ought to be allowed all liberties and privileges compatible with that restriction； including the free management of municipal affairs； and as a compensation for being locally sacrificed to the convenience of the governing State； should be admitted to equal rights with its native subjects in all other parts of the empire。 Outlying territories of some size and population； which are held as dependencies； that is； which are subject； more or less； to acts of sovereign power on the part of the paramount country； without being equally represented （if represented at all） in its legislature； may be divided into two classes。 Some are composed of people of similar civilisation to the ruling country； capable of； and ripe for； representative government： such as the British possessions in America and Australia。 Others； like India； are still at a great distance from that state。 In the case of dependencies of the former class； this country has at length realised； in rare completeness； the true principle of government。 England has always felt under a certain degree of obligation to bestow on such of her outlying populations as were of her own blood and language； and on some who were not； representative institutions formed in imitation of her own： but until the present generation； she has been on the same bad level with other countries as to the amount of self…government which she allowed them to exercise through the representative institutions that she conceded to them。 She claimed to be the supreme arbiter even of their purely internal concerns； according to her own； not their； ideas of how those concerns could be best regulated。 This practice was a natural corollary from the vicious theory of colonial policy… once common to all Europe； and not yet completely relinquished by any other people… which regarded colonies as valuable by affording markets for our commodities； that could be kept entirely to ourselves： a privilege we valued so highly that we thought it worth purchasing by allowing to the colonies the same monopoly of our market for their own productions which we claimed for our commodities in theirs。 This notable plan for enriching them and ourselves； by making each pay enormous sums to the other； dropping the greatest part by the way； has been for some time abandoned。 But the bad habit of meddling in the internal government of the colonies did not at once terminate when we relinquished the idea of making any profit by it。 We continued to torment them； not for any benefit to ourselves； but for that of a section or faction among the colonists： and this persistence in domineering cost us a Canadian rebellion before we had the happy thought of giving it up。 England was like an ill…brought…up elder brother； who persists in tyrannising over the younger ones from mere habit； till one of them； by a spirited resistance； though with unequal strength； gives him notice to desist。 We were wise enough not to require a second warning。 A new era in the colonial policy of nations began with Lord Durham's Report； the imperishable memorial of that nobleman's courage； patriotism； and enlightened liberality； and of the intellect and practical sagacity of its joint authors； Mr。 Wakefield and the lamented Charles Buller。*
* I am speaking here of the adoption of this improved policy； not； of course； of its original suggestion。 The honour of having been its earliest champion belongs unquestionably to Mr。 Roebuck。
It is now a fixed principle of the policy of Great Britain； professed in theory and faithfully adhered to in practice； that her colonies of European race； equally with the parent country； possess the fullest measure of internal self…government。 They have been allowed to make their own free representative constitutions by altering in any manner they thought fit the already very popular constitutions which we had given them。 Each is governed by its own legislature and executive； constituted on highly democratic principles。 The veto of the Crown and of Parliament； though nominally reserved； is only exercised （and that very rarely） on questions which concern the empire； and not solely the particular colony。 How liberal a construction has been given to the distinction between imperial and colonial questions is shown by the fact that the whole of the unappropriated lands in the regions behind our American and Australian colonies have been given up to the uncontrolled disposal of the colonial communities； though they might； without injustice； have been kept in the hands of the Imperial Government； to be administered for the greatest advantage of future emigrants from all parts of the empire。 Every colony has thus as full power over its own affairs as it could have if it were a member of even the loosest federation； and much fuller than would belong to it under the Constitution of the United States； being free even to tax at its pleasure the commodities imported from the mother country。 Their union with Great Britain is the slightest kind of federal union； but not a strictly equal federation； the mother country retaining to itself the powers of a Federal Government； though reduced in practice to their very narrowest limits。 This inequality is； of course； as far as it goes； a disadvantage to the dependencies； which have no voice in foreign policy； but are bound by the decisions of the superior country。 They are compelled to join England in war； without being in any way consulted previous to engaging in it。 Those （now happily not a few） who think that justice is as binding on communities as it is on individuals； and that men are not warranted in doing to other countries； for the supposed benefit of their own country； what they would not be justified in doing to other men for their own benefit… feel even this limited amount of constitutional subordination on the part of the colonies to be a violation of principle； and have often occupied themselves in looking out for means by which it may be avoided。 With this view it has been proposed by some that the colonies should return representatives to the British legislature； and by others； that the powers of our own； as well as of their Parliaments； should be confined to internal policy； and that there should be another representative body for foreign and imperial concerns； in which last the dependencies of Great Britain should be represented in the same manner； and with the same completeness； as Great Britain itself。 On this system there would be perfectly equal federation between the mother country and her colonies； then no longer dependencies。 The feelings of equity； and conceptions of public morality； from which these suggestions emanate； are worthy of all praise； but the suggestions themselves are so inconsistent with rational principles of government that it is doubtful if they have been seriously accepted as a possibility by any reasonable thinker。 Countries separated by half the globe do not present the natural conditions for being under one government； or even members of one federation。 If they had sufficiently the same interests； they have not； and never can have； a sufficient habit of taking counsel together。 They are not part of the same public； they do not discuss and deliberate in the same arena； but apart； and have only a most imperfect knowledge of what passes in the minds of one another。 They neither know each other's objects； nor have confidence in each other's principles of conduct。 Let any Englishman ask himself how he should like his destinies to depend on an assembly of which one…third was British American； and another third South African and Australian。 Yet to this it must come if there were anything like fair or equal representation； and would not every one feel that the representatives of Canada and Australia； even in matters of an imperial character； could not know； or feel any sufficient concern for； the interests； opinions； or wishes of English； Irish； and Scotch？ Even for strictly federative purposes the conditions do not exist which we have seen to be essential to a federation。 England is sufficient for her own protection without the colonies； and would be in a much stronger； as well as more dignified position；