友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
九色书籍 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

the writings-5-第27章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




such right is impliedly affirmed in the Constitution; but they pledge

their veracity that it is 〃distinctly and expressly〃 affirmed there…

…〃distinctly;〃 that is; not mingled with anything else; 〃expressly;〃

that is; in words meaning just that; without the aid of any

inference; and susceptible of no other meaning。



If they had only pledged their judicial opinion that such right is

affirmed in the instrument by implication; it would be open to others

to show that neither the word 〃slave〃 nor 〃slavery〃 is to be found in

the Constitution; nor the word 〃property〃 even; in any connection

with language alluding to the things slave or slavery; and that

wherever in that instrument the slave is alluded to; he is called a

〃person〃; and wherever his master's legal right in relation to him is

alluded to; it is spoken of as 〃service or labor which may be due;〃

as a debt payable in service or labor。  Also; it would be open to

show; by contemporaneous history; that this mode of alluding to

slaves and slavery; instead of speaking of them; was employed on

purpose to exclude from the Constitution the idea that there could be

property in man。



To show all this; is easy and certain。



When this obvious mistake of the judges shall be brought to their

notice; is it not reasonable to expect that they will withdraw the

mistaken statement; and reconsider the conclusion based upon it?



And then it is to be remembered that 〃our fathers; who framed the

Government under which we live〃;the men who made the Constitution

decided this same constitutional question in our favor; long ago;

decided it without division among themselves; when making the

decision; without division among themselves about the meaning of it

after it was made; and; so far as any evidence is left; without

basing it upon any mistaken statement of facts。



Under all these circumstances; do you really feel yourselves

justified to break up this Government unless such a court decision as

yours is shall be at once submitted to as a conclusive and final rule

of political action?  But you will not abide the election of a

Republican President!  In that supposed event; you say; you will

destroy the Union;; and then; you say; the great crime of having

destroyed it will be upon us!  That is cool。  A highwayman holds a

pistol to my ear; and mutters through his teeth; 〃stand and deliver;

or I shall kill you; and then you'll be a murderer!〃



To be sure; what the robber demanded of me…my money was my own; and I

had a clear right to keep it; but it was no more my own than my vote

is my own; and the threat of death to me; to extort my money; and the

threat of destruction to the Union; to extort my vote; can scarcely

be distinguished in principle。



A few words now to Republicans: It is exceedingly desirable that all

parts of this great confederacy shall be at peace and in harmony one

with another。  Let us Republicans do our part to have it so。  Even

though much provoked; let us do nothing through passion and ill

temper。  Even though the Southern people will not so much as listen

to us; let us calmly consider their demands; and yield to them if; in

our deliberate view of our duty; we possibly can。  Judging by all

they say and do; and by the subject and nature of their controversy

with us; let us determine; if we can; what will satisfy them。



Will they be satisfied if the Territories be unconditionally

surrendered to them?  We know they will not。  In all their present

complaints against us; the Territories are scarcely mentioned。

Invasions and insurrections are the rage now。  Will it satisfy them

if; in the future; we have nothing to do with invasions and;

insurrections?  We know it will not。  We so know because we know we

never had anything to do with invasions and insurrections; and yet

this total abstaining does not exempt us from the charge and the

denunciation。



The question recurs; what will satisfy them?  Simply this: We must

not only let them alone; but we must; somehow; convince them that we

do let them alone。  This; we know by experience; is no easy task。

We have been so trying to convince them from the very beginning of

our organization; but with no success。  In all our platforms and

speeches we have constantly protested our purpose to let them alone;

but this has had no tendency to convince them。  Alike unavailing to

convince them is the fact that they have never detected a man of us

in any attempt to disturb them。



These natural and apparently adequate means all failing; what will

convince them?  This; and this only: cease to call slavery wrong; and

join them in calling it right。  And this must be done thoroughly

done in acts as well as in words。  Silence will not be toleratedwe

must place ourselves avowedly with them。  Senator Douglas's new

sedition law must be enacted and enforced; suppressing all

declarations that slavery is wrong; whether made in politics; in

presses; in pulpits; or in private。  We must arrest and return their

fugitive slaves with greedy pleasure。  We must pull down our free

State constitutions。  The whole atmosphere must be disinfected from

all taint of opposition to slavery; before they will cease to believe

that all their troubles proceed from us。



I am quite aware they do not state their case precisely in this way。

Most of them would probably say to us; 〃Let us alone; do nothing to

us; and say what you please about slavery。〃  But we do let them alone

have never disturbed themso that after all it is what we say which

dissatisfies them。  They will continue to accuse us of doing; until

we cease saying。



I am also aware they have not as yet; in terms; demanded the

overthrow of our free State constitutions。  Yet those constitutions

declare the wrong of slavery; with more solemn emphasis than do all

other sayings against it; and when all these other sayings shall have

been silenced; the overthrow of these constitutions will be demanded;

and nothing be left to resist the demand。  It is nothing to the

contrary; that they do not demand the whole of this just now。

Demanding what they do; and for the reason they do; they can

voluntarily stop nowhere short of this consummation。  Holding; as

they do; that slavery is morally right; and socially elevating; they

cannot cease to demand a full national recognition of it; as a legal

right and a social blessing。



Nor can we justifiably withhold this on any ground save our

conviction that slavery is wrong。  If slavery is right; all words;

acts; laws; and constitutions against it are themselves wrong; and

should be silenced and swept away。  If it is right; we cannot justly

object to its nationality its universality; if it is wrong; they

cannot justly insist upon its extensionits enlargement。  All they

ask we could readily grant if we thought slavery right; all we ask

they could as readily grant; if they thought it wrong。  Their

thinking it right and our thinking it wrong is the precise fact upon

which depends the whole controversy。  Thinking it right; as they do;

they are not to blame for desiring its full recognition; as being

right; but thinking it wrong; as we do; can we yield to them?  Can we

cast our votes with their view; and against our own?  In view of our

moral; social; and political responsibilities; can we do this?  Wrong

as we think slavery is; we can yet afford to let it alone where it

is; because that much is due to the necessity arising from its actual

presence in the nation; but can we; while our votes will prevent it;

allow it to spread into the national Territories; and to overrun us

here in these free States?  If our sense of duty forbids this; then

let us stand by our duty; fearlessly and effectively。  Let us be

diverted by none of those sophistical contrivances wherewith we are

so industriously plied and belabored…contrivances such as groping for

some middle ground between the right and the wrong; vain as the

search for a man who should be neither a living man nor a dead

man…such as a policy of 〃don't care〃 on a question about which all

true men do caresuch as Union appeals beseeching true Union men to

yield to Disunionists; reversing the divine rule; and calling; not

the sinners; but the righteous to repentancesuch as invocations to

Washington; imploring men to unsay what Washington said; and undo

what Washington did。



Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations

against us; nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the

Government nor of dungeons to ourselves。 LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT

MAKES MIGHT; AND IN THAT FAITH LET US; TO THE END; DARE TO DO OUR

DUTY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT。









SPEECH AT NEW HAVEN; CONNECTICUT; MARCH 6; 1860



MR。 PRESIDENT; AND FELLOW…CITIZENS OF NEW HAVEN:If the Republican

party of this nation shall ever have the national House entrusted to

its keeping; it will be the duty of that party to attend to all the

affairs of
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 1
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!